Automate Construction Power Ranking 2026

New year, new power ranking! Check out the rubric below, it is imperfect but it’s my attempt at ranking the various competitors in the construction automation world. I only include companies that contribute to the building process, no scanners, layout bots, or extraneous software. Only hardware, robotics, and companies who truly contribute to building the final structure.

My name is Jarett Gross and my journey around the world visiting construction automation companies has reached over a billion people online. This year Automate Construction will begin to offer in person courses on operating construction automation equipment. If you would like to sign up for the first course on how to 3D concrete, reach out to me on the contact page and I will reserve one of the limited spots. Only 6 remain of 16 total available spots and we recommend teams of 3-4. We will print with a pro team and each person from your group will operate a different role to print a wall.

For transparency I have invested in some of the companies through publicly available crowdfinding and others have sponsored videos in the past but this is an unbiased ranking attempt, not all companies I’ve invested in or taken sponsorships from have been listed.

If you disagree with my ranking reach out and I will explain how I did it and why your company scored the way it did relative to other companies near your score.

I do not know everything and I know this list isn’t perfect. One founder last year complained about their financing score because he claims to be personally very wealthy but without clear public evidence his wealth has been invested into his construction automation startup rather than his other endeavors, his personal wealth is not a factor in their financing score.

I do my best to only rank companies based on publicly available information.

With all that out of the way here is the Automate Construction Ranking 2026! Congratulations to the top 50 companies, even the bottom of the list beat out over 400 other firms in the space so it’s a hard club to get in and everyone listed should be proud!

In February we are running the first hands on 3DCP training in Florida. Email me for more details automateconstruction.com/contact

Company NamePower Ranking Score
Horizon Legacy
12
Evocons13
Instatiq13
Rudenko13
M3DSA13
Tvasta14
Macro 3D14
MiCob15
Cosmos 3D15
Heidelberg15
Cobod15
Print3DTechnologies15
UTU15
Lumina *15
Madco3D16
Apis Cor16
Xhab17
Contour 3D17
Vertico17
Cybe17
Muddy Robots17
TRS Tech17
Wasp 3D18
Innotech 3D18
CES Innovfab18
PERI18
KKrane19
Coral19
Printed Farms19
Emergent 3D19
Constructions 3D19
Botbuilt19
RIC20
SQ4D20
M-Tech20
Pikus 3D20
Boxabl21
Moneumental21
MAI22
Advanced Construction Robotics22
Sika22
Fastbrick Robotics23
Built Robotics23
Alquist 3D24
Oshkosh24
3D Plotter24
AutoVol24
Caterpillar25
Hive25
Icon27

As always, I hope everyone is offended 🙂

Complaints will be met with a private review of your rubric scoring.

Check out the ranking from previous years!

2024 Ranking

2025 Ranking

POWER RANKING RUBRIC

Activity

How busy is the company or tech working directly on construction automation projects?

  1. No current projects
  2. Small activity
  3. Daily building
  4. Notably high activity 
  5. Scaled multi team 24 hr activity (None yet achieved)

Funding

How much access to capital does the company have

  1. Bootstrapped
  2. Pre Seed
  3. Seed
  4. 10M+
  5. 100M+

Commercialization

Is the company doing projects, selling systems, and operating like a typical contractor

  1. No commercial revenue
  2. Small or subsidized commercial revenue
  3. At least some work is sold with the expectation of profit
  4. Regularly doing projects with expectation of profit
  5. Gold rush (None yet achieved)

Code Compliance

Is the product sold following typical codes and regulations permissible everywhere?

  1. No code is followed in any projects or project ending non compliance
  2. Light local restrictions allow activity
  3. Permitted projects in typical regions
  4. Permitted projects in extra challenging regions
  5. Identical to traditional methods in ease of permitting

Innovation

Is the company doing new things all the time?

  1. No notable improvements over last year
  2. Small progress
  3. Clearly innovating
  4. Wildly unique
  5. Vertically integrated innovation

Reliability

Does the company follow through on promised projects, predictions, and products? 

  1. Multiple cases of no follow through
  2. Typical startup challenges
  3. Consistently delivers
  4. Exceptional delivery & delivery rate
  5. Top tier reliability (None yet achieved)

Publicity

Do people know the company exists?

  1. Why are you so secret? Get the word out!
  2. Minor publicity
  3. Substantial publicity
  4. Above average media exposure
  5. Enormous PR 

Construction

Do they build stuff and operate like a normal construction company or construction equipment provider?

  1. Operating like early startup
  2. Some construction 
  3. Contractor or commercial equipment provider
  4. Experienced GC
  5. Major construction player

Momentum

Are they growing and expanding or are their achievements getting old?

  1. Activity is stale or shrinking
  2. Advancing slowly
  3. Rapidly scaling

Disclaimer: Not investment advice, I have participated in public crowd funding with companies listed here as an investor and also taken sponsorships from companies listed. The sponsorship is flat rate and not every company that sponsored a video makes the list. It is my goal to be an unbiased judge.

World of Concrete 2026

Another year, another World of Concrete. I am still disappointed by the pricing structure of the show, charging per pound (roughly $1/ pound I hear) of material brought in makes it very expensive to bring a printer plus a few tons of concrete to print at the show. One group with a small printer said their cost to print at the show would have been $60,000. The booths featuring live printing are always some of the biggest attention grabbers. Only 2 groups were printing this year, RIC and Quikrete. Quikrete sponsors the Bricklayer 500 event every year where they bring in many tons of bricks for masons to compete building small wall segments and the winner gets a new truck. It’s possible this large sponsorship gives them a lower cost per pound on freight brought into the show.

I think it would be a good investment for WOC to find a way to subsidize the cost per pound for companies doing impressive demonstrations like live printing concrete.

The good news is there were far more 3DCP companies attending the show and I did my best to get a picture of each one so that you can get the best parts of the show without having to show up yourself.

Two men standing in front of a booth at a trade show, showcasing Geopolymer International products, including advanced ceramic items and promotional materials.

Geopolymer international, the Vegas locals were my first stop at the show. They are looking forward to an active 2026, splitting their efforts into a dedicated geopolymer materials company and a separate 3dcp company that will work with cementitious mortars as well.

A tradeshow booth for Spacer Robotics showcasing an automated rebar-tying robot. Three representatives are present: two standing behind a table with laptops and informational materials, and one in front near a display sign and the robot.

Spacer Robotics was the next booth to catch my eye at the show, they just started this year but that little bot on the floor will be able to tie rebar on site. Looking forward to seeing that in action!

A person sitting on a unique, textured bench featuring the MAPEI logo at a trade show, with a decorative backdrop related to 3D printing technologies.

Mapei finally brought printed concrete to the show again, and with it came Peter Cooperman who is very happy to be contributing to the 3DCP industry again.

Two men posing for a selfie at an exhibition booth showcasing a 3D printing technology, with a focus on a device in the foreground.

Caught up with Vertico next, by now you may have noticed the order is time sequential as I try to do with all my content. Here, Volker is showing off their 2k print head. These guys are well known for printing some of the most beautiful parametric designs.

Two men posing for a photo outdoors at a convention, with construction equipment visible in the background and a parking structure.

KKrane was one of the most recent site visits of Automate Construction, we got a couple million views on the 40 ft tower, 2 homes, and new HQ all printed by Zach. We also got to see the printer that he built them all with in action. Check it out for yourself!

A group of four people posing for a selfie at an outdoor event, with a large modern building in the background and a crowd in the vicinity.

Here is the Marco 3D team, a few legends from NJ who used a 3D Potter Scara printer to print the biggest single family residential project in America and possibly the world. The owner/GC quoted the project at 3000 sqft for the main house, 1800 sqft garage with 2nd story, 1800 sqft pool house. I got to film the last exterior layers of this project, video coming soon! I will link it here when it’s done in a month or so.

Three men posing for a photo outdoors at a construction event, with industrial equipment and a parking structure in the background.

Here we have 2/3 of the Xtreme Habitats Giants, Jeff on the left was the GC for the Alaska Project in Nome that I got to visit. These days short form content pulls in millions of views on every visit I do but this one in particular was the best performing long form youtube video of the year for the Automate Construction channel. I guess people love to see a challenge and printing in Alaska is no easy feat. Their transparency in sharing certain struggles definitely contributed to the success of this video.

A person in a black suit poses next to an orange 3D concrete printer at an outdoor event, surrounded by people observing the technology.

Zi from RIC was looking like John Wick, we always appreciate a group that goes the extra mile of printing at the show. In engineering everything always seems to fall apart during the demo like the famous Elon Musk cannonball through the window of the Cybertruck moment. Luckily for RIC catastrophe was avoided but an extremely uneven ‘print surface’ (the parking lot) with 3 inches rise in some places led to a tricky first layer. The pros know printers properly calibrated will eventually self correct as they did here, showing off nice clean parallel layers. Here’s a video of me and Zi putting a printed wall through trial by fire in the desert after last years WOC, soon we are planning to increase the firepower, stay tuned.

Two men posing for a selfie at an outdoor event, with a construction vehicle in the background.

Shahaf is a printing company from Israel who developed their own printer developing military style bunkers with printed concrete.

A speaker in a beige blazer and a cap talks at a podium, while another man in a checkered shirt listens attentively in a conference room.

Noah from Sika was hosting an educational event for 3DCP at the show assembling a diverse group of industry experts to share industry insights. There were a couple companies that commandeered the opportunity for self promotion but the educational segment by Sika in the first 45 minutes was very high quality.

A speaker stands at a podium during a presentation, with a slide displaying a light green globe and the MAI International logo in the background. The audience is partially visible in front.

MAI is one of the most successful mixer pump brands for 3DCP they apparently sold 60-70 mixer pump systems to the 3DCP industry in 2025.

A speaker presents in front of an audience at a conference, with a large screen displaying a robotic arm used in construction.

Alquist 3D was showing off their new printer and excitement for more Walmart projects coming soon. Check out the last one I got to visit!

A speaker presenting in front of a large screen displaying an image of a 3D-printed wall structure.

Vitruvian was showing off some work they did with a Constructions 3D printer in Ohio, I believe these are the first permitted homes successfully printed on a Constructions 3D system in the United States hopefully many more to come.

Two men posing for a selfie at an event, with one wearing glasses and a cap, and the other wearing a beige jacket; a third person is visible in the background.

Kaneshka is the CEO/Architect/Founder of Konstra, a printer manufacturer with some outside the box designs printing this year in California.

Their client K4K bought a printer and will be bringing Kaneshkas designs to life in California, they gave a presentation at the show and I thought I got a picture but I can’t seem to find it, I had intended to include it here.

Three individuals posing for a photo indoors, likely at a conference or event, with a gray wall in the background.

Constructions 3D was at the show, their Citadel project in France is one of the most ambitious in the industry and now that their printer has done permitted homes in America we should be seeing them more and more.

A selfie featuring two men at a conference, one wearing a light-colored jacket and the other a dark blazer. In the background, a woman walks by with tables and drinks visible.

Twente Additive Manufacturing was at the show with a developer working on a big project that will hopefully implement a tech we saw at their HQ in my video years ago.

Two men posing for a selfie in a conference room, one with a light brown jacket and the other with a plaid shirt and glasses.

I am not the biggest fan of regulations or regulatory organizations but it was very reassuring to meet Shawn Platt, one of the experts on the Sika panel from NIST. My impression of NIST was that they were the old wise men in the high castle far removed from the blue collar work happening on the ground but Shawn is an exception having experience in a large variety of trades (still wise too).

Three men smiling for a selfie in a conference setting, with a room in the background.

The Printera team was at the show too, they will be moving to a new facility soon. Check out my video with them from earlier in the year.

Two individuals posing for a selfie at a Quikrete exhibit at a trade show, with promotional materials and a display in the background.

Quikrete was one the only booths printing at the show. They must have a great dust mitigation system to be printing at the show like that!

Two men posing for a photo in a convention center, surrounded by various construction equipment and machinery in the background.

Coral 3D had a booth at the show this year (previously known as ice but changed to a friendlier name). They even brought a printer that was dancing around a bit but no actual printing. They do have some incredible projects over in Europe and hopefully some in America coming soon.

Two individuals posing for a selfie at an event, with an exhibit in the background displaying a '2K Concrete Printer Head' sign.

Avenco 3D was showing off some very nice printed elements at the show.

Two men posing together for a selfie in a dimly lit venue with red lighting and a television in the background displaying an event.

I met Robotic Construction Technologies for the first time, they don’t do much media stuff but I think in a year or two they will be ready for a big public feature on Automate Construction (no rush, whenever you’re ready).

A man in a red shirt stands next to various orange construction machines at an exhibition. The machines include a pump and a conveyor system, all set against a black carpet.

Ventures Equipment has a new mixer pump they were showing off at the show.

A smiling man with a beard wearing a blue patterned shirt, standing in front of a display banner at an event.

Gardon Construction was represented at the show, currently in an R&D phase for printing in the elements.

A man standing next to a screen displaying an aerial view of a construction site with a crane. The background shows an exhibition setting with attendees and booths.

Putzmeister featured Instatiq with a little video demo table at their massive booth of like 20+ giant pump trucks. Just bring the Instatiq next time you already brought 20 others the same size.

And that’s the show! I got to meet a ton of other people too but kept this list to only those who are printing. I do think it was the biggest year for 3DCP attendees even though the number of companies printing was disappointing.

There are some awesome new project coming soon this year and I’m also debuting an in person 3DCP training opportunity in collaboration with a few of your favorite 3DCP companies. The first one will be hosted by 3D Potter in Florida on February 25th and 26th. You will get hands on printing experience and expert lectures around topics like materials, permitting, and 3D modeling. Seats are extremely limited, email me via Jarett@3dprinted.construction to reserve a seat.

Automate Construction Power Ranking 2025

Welcome to the second annual Automate Construction Power Ranking. The one time of year I compare startups against each other using a carefully crafted & transparent rubric in an imperfect attempt to measure their power in the construction automation industry.

This is not a ranking of investment quality or a predictor of success. Certainly not investment advice.

My name is Jarett Gross, 5 years ago I started filming the very first permitted 3D printed buildings and I haven’t stopped since.

This does not make me an expert, I’m just a guy with internet access reaching 100M+ people per year.

2025 was the first year I started doing sponsored videos on my channel. As a journalist I would be skeptical of a ranking which includes companies with sponsorships, understandable. To ease your concern I’d like to share with you that not every company which sponsored a video of mine made the top 50 list. Only 2 companies who sponsored videos made the top 20.

To raise your concern, much has occurred since this list was finalized almost a year ago and if I were to redo it today based on my current knowledge it would be different. I considered not posting but this is a valid reflection of my opinions at the time it was written. I will post an updated list some time for 2026, I am already working on the 2026 ranking process.

I do my best to remain unbiased, my biggest weakness is awareness bias… of 400+ construction automation companies the information available to me is only a fraction of the picture.

The transparent rubric at the bottom may be challenged at any time by any construction automation company on or off this list. I will tell you your ranking offline and although the specific grading breakdown of each competitor is not public, I will give you examples of other companies who scored higher or lower in the categories you disagree with me on so that you can understand my logic & good faith attempt at neutral bias. Please note the rubric changed from 2024 to 2025, I added a ‘Momentum’ category to grade companies based on their growth trajectory from last year. Due to the lag in release, there are a couple offensive omissions who would have been included if I ranked them today and a couple laughable inclusions of companies that are no longer operating at all who will certainly not make next years list.

Remember, this is not a list of my favorite companies just the results of a rubric I came up with in an attempt at measuring the immeasurable. Congratulations to the 50 companies ranked out of hundreds. It’s only getting more competitive every year!

Company NamePower Ranking Score
MiCob
Printer Manufacturer from India with military projects

16
Cosmos 3D
Printer Manufacturer & Traditional GC on large projects
16
Rudenko
Printer Manufacturer, 3DCP OG
16
RIC
Printer Manufacturer from China
17
New Standard Homes
Printing team in Texas
17
M3DUSA
Printer Manufacturer from Germany
17
Printera
Print Operator in FL
17
Alquist 3D
Print Operator behind Walmarts & Other buildings
18
Tvasta
Printer Manufacturer from India
18
Contour 3D
Printer Manufacturer from Australia
18
Print4d
Printer Manufacturer in Prague
18
ICE 3DCP
Printer Manufacturer from Czech Replublic
18
Heidelberg
German Materials Company
18
Raise Robotics
Robotic Arms on construction sites
19
Vertico
Printer Manufacturer from The Netherlands
19
Figure
Humanoid Robot Manufacturer
19
Wasp 3D
Printer Manufacturer from Italy
19
XTreee
Printer Manufacturer from France
19
3D Potter
Budget Printer Manufacturer from Florida
19
Cybe
Printer Manufacturer from The Netherlands
19
Cobod
Printer Manufacturer from Denmark
19
Muddy Robots
Adobe Print Operator
19
Print3DTechnologies
Printer Manufacturer in Texas
19
Madco 3D
Print Operator in New Hampshire
19
Gaudi
Printer Manufacturer from China
19
Innotech 3D
Printer Manufacturer from Oman
19
Printstone 3D
Printer Manufacturer from Dubai
19
TRS Tech
Printer Manufacturer from Iran
19
SmartBuild
Printer Manufacturer from Russia
19
Sq4D
Printer Manufacturer from NY
20
MAI
Mixer Pump Manufacturer
20
Macro 3D
Printer Manufacturer from Australia
20
UTU
Printer Manufacturer from Ukraine
20
FIBO
Batch Plant Manufacturer
21
M-Tech
Mixer Pump Manufacturer
21
Apis Cor
Printer Manufacturer
21
LT Construction
Print Operator from India
21
Printed Farms
Print Operator from FL
22
Neri Oxman
Bioprinting
22
Emergent 3D
Print Operator in CA
22
Pikus 3d
Printer Manufacturer/operator in Utah
22
Constructions 3D
Printer Manufacturer in France
23
PERI 3D
Print operator
23
Hive
Print operator
24
Botbuilt
Robotic prefab framework
24
Sika
Materials company
24
Icon
Printer Manufacturer/ Operator in TX
25
Boxabl
Prefab residential unit production
25
AutoVol
Prefab commercial unit production
26
Fastbrick Robotics
Bricklaying robot
28

I hope everyone is offended, even Fastbrick Robotics. They have not maintained pace through mid 2025 though perhaps they are working on advancements quietly behind the scenes.

Complaints will be met with a private review of your rubric scoring.

Check out the ranking from last year!

2024 Ranking (https://automateconstruction.com/2023/12/29/automate-construction-power-ranking-2024/)

POWER RANKING RUBRIC

Activity

How busy is the company or tech working directly on construction automation projects?

  1. No current projects
  2. Small activity
  3. Daily building
  4. Notably high activity 
  5. Scaled multi team 24 hr activity (None yet achieved)

Funding

How much access to capital does the company have

  1. Bootstrapped
  2. Pre Seed
  3. Seed
  4. 10M+
  5. 100M+

Commercialization

Is the company doing projects, selling systems, and operating like a typical contractor

  1. No commercial revenue
  2. Small or subsidized commercial revenue
  3. At least some work is sold with the expectation of profit
  4. Regularly doing projects with expectation of profit
  5. Gold rush (None yet achieved)

Code Compliance

Is the product sold following typical codes and regulations permissible everywhere?

  1. No code is followed in any projects or project ending non compliance
  2. Light local restrictions allow activity
  3. Permitted projects in typical regions
  4. Permitted projects in extra challenging regions
  5. Identical to traditional methods in ease of permitting

Innovation

Is the company doing new things all the time?

  1. No notable improvements over last year
  2. Small progress
  3. Clearly innovating
  4. Wildly unique
  5. Vertically integrated innovation

Reliability

Does the company follow through on promised projects, predictions, and products? 

  1. Multiple cases of no follow through
  2. Typical startup challenges
  3. Consistently delivers
  4. Exceptional delivery & delivery rate
  5. Top tier reliability (None yet achieved)

Publicity

Do people know the company exists?

  1. Why are you so secret? Get the word out!
  2. Minor publicity
  3. Substantial publicity
  4. Above average media exposure
  5. Enormous PR 

Construction

Do they build stuff and operate like a normal construction company or construction equipment provider?

  1. Operating like early startup
  2. Some construction 
  3. Contractor or commercial equipment provider
  4. Experienced GC
  5. Major construction player

Momentum

Are they growing and expanding or are their achievements getting old?

  1. Activity is stale or shrinking
  2. Advancing slowly
  3. Rapidly scaling

I, House

Manufacturing is difficult and more important than ever. Most people underestimate the complexity behind simple things especially when they cost a fraction of a dollar but even object that can be acquired for small change require an army of skilled people to deliver the final product.

This was the core thesis of “I, Pencil” written by Leonard E. Read. This famous vintage essay illuminated the hidden intricacy behind things that appear fairly simple on the surface level, if you haven’t read it yet check it out for yourself. https://fee.org/ebooks/i-pencil/

After playing tennis in the sun with a friend (I won) we chatted it up and while describing his current job as an environmental lawyer, he brought up I, Pencil as an allegory for how complicated cases are handled. While listening to the details of how a massive case is chopped up into bite size pieces and distributed to those best suited to handle them, I couldn’t help but draw an analogy to construction, specifically construction innovation.

The first thing I considered was the basic Subcontractor/GC hierarchy with an average of 22 subcontractors required to build a single family home (ranging from 11-30). Unfortunately for the housing crisis, the complexity doesn’t end there.

Thinking back to the I, Pencil essay reveals final assembly is only a fraction of the problem. They discuss procuring lumber, graphite, metals, paint, whatever the heck erasers are made of… you get the point.

Now look around your home, everything from the drain pipes up to the roof tiles are independent products many of which have far greater complexity than a basic #2 pencil.

How do we fix it?

I don’t know but I have some ideas.

Let’s revisit one of my favorite inventors of all time, John Moses Browning. His creations are heralded as the most reliable of all time, outperforming even modern pistols on military durability testing. What did he have that others didn’t?

He had an understanding of the complete process.

Browning would design the entire pistol himself and assemble it himself too. His acute omniscience didn’t end there, he would also hand make the manufacturing tools to produce his product at scale. At first glance it may seem impractical for one person to tackle so many aspects of production, wouldn’t it be better to find the best designer, and the best blacksmith then distribute responsibility accordingly?

The magic of the Browning process was the precision with which he could tweak tiny tolerances producing weapons that were more accurate and reliable than anything the military had ever seen before.

Today even the design of a new firearm is divided between massive teams each responsible for 1 CAD file which are then combined to make the digital twin of a new model. From there they often outsource production of each part to different large teams who may or may not even be in communication. The spring manufacturer likely has no contact with the barrel manufacturer or the production team behind the slide. You end up with a game of telephone so complex it’s a miracle when they finally get it working. Though many salaried workers are passionate about their jobs, the incentive for perfection just isn’t as strong as the motive of John Moses Browning who personally won his contracts with the US military for his work.

It’s not trivial, it leads to tragedy like the recent death at Warren Air Force Base caused by an M18 that misfired when it was dropped, killing the owner of the government issued firearm (The owner of that firearm has since been arrested implying it may not have been a misfire).

I’m not saying we need one person to orchestrate every minute detail of building a house, thats frankly untenable from my perspective.

When I was doing construction labor on commercial buildings for a few months after college, I quickly learned the GC’s right hand man was a Polish carpenter. This guy knew his shit. The GC was only on site for maybe a couple hours 2-3 days a week so when he wasn’t around it was this skilled carpenter who called most of the shots. He knew how to read plans and he knew when to ignore them because the architect had some of the plumbing wrong in the pre construction as-built. Lego is a beautiful standard but in the real world, constructing a building from parts often means some of the parts don’t perfectly match your little instruction booklet the way Legos do.

It may not be the carpenter on every job but there is almost always someone who understands far beyond their specific role, not from a top down perspective like the GC with the primary responsibility of measuring competency and negotiating contracts but a bottom up perspective who deeply comprehends the nuts and bolts from years of screwing them together.

So here’s my big idea of the day.

If you want to innovate the future of housing you need some grey beards with that innate understanding for the job site to bridge the gap between the future and the present. It’s pretty wild how something as everyday as making stuff like a pencil, a gun, or even a whole house hides this massive tangle of knowhow that nobody can really wrap their head around alone. That’s the genius of Leonard E. Read’s old essay “I, Pencil,” showing how it takes a whole orchestra of talents to pull off what looks dead simple. But then you have folks like John Moses Browning who nailed it by owning every step, from sketching ideas to cranking out the tools for mass production. These days, with everything chopped up among subs, far flung suppliers, and teams that barely talk, that big-picture grasp slips away, causing screwups, wasted time, and yeah, sometimes real heartbreak. If we’re serious about fixing the mess in housing and pushing building tech ahead, we’ve got to give the spotlight to those old school pros the “grey beards” with their hands on smarts from years in the trenches who can handle the messiness of actual job sites. They’re the ones who can connect pie in the sky plans with the gritty here and now, unlocking ways to create tougher, smarter homes and systems. So, why not hunt them down, soak up what they know, and weave it in before another wonky fitting or bad weld throws everything off track?

Every 3D Printed Airbnb Home

Having stayed in some myself, I realized there are probably many people around the world eager for the experience to stay in a 3D printed house and today there are many opportunities to do so at various price points. I took the liberty of sharing every Airbnb link I could find for 3D printed houses with you below, let me know if I’m missing any (I certainly am) and I will be sure to update this article to include it.

Let’s get started! First we will list the properties I’ve been able to personally visit and film, if you’d like be to stop by your 3D printed airbnb and make a video just reach out via the contact form on this website.

Fibonacci House

Location: Central Kootenay E, Canada

I got to stay in this awesome home years ago courtesy of TAM, this one is unique because their headquarters and print facility is located just up the road! You may even get a chance to meet some of their team (no promises). Reaching this location is an adventure in itself, about an hour east of Nelson, BC you’ll take a ferry to this otherwise inaccessible natural getaway.

Casitas at the Halles

Location: Round Top, Texas, USA

These 4 homes are all available on Airbnb and are among the most well documented on my channel over a series of many videos showing off their progress under construction and post completion. A short video of this project was my most viewed video of all time with over 200M views across social media. My video of this project starts with another home they sold which is not available on Airbnb but the other 4 linked below are also toured by Hive CEO Tim Lankau at the end of the video.

East 17th Icon Homes

Location: Austin, Texas, USA

I got to stay in these homes with influencer Belinda Carr where we recorded a podcast and reviewed the details of the home we got to stay in. I happen to live in Austin so if you are in town make sure to say hi, maybe we can grab tacos together if I’m not traveling to a 3D printed house somewhere. This one is on VRBO but certainly still counts!

First Printed Home in Ohio

Location: Wapakoneta, Ohio, USA

Like the Hive homes in the previous listings, this home was also printed by a Cybe printer with a different team. The home is located on a 150 acre farm.

Mighty Buildings Homes

Location: Yucca Valley, California, USA

Mighty Buildings may be bankrupt and out of business but these AirBnbs are still up and running! Personally I strongly dislike polymers as a primary material for housing and being UV cured is even worse in my opinion. Despite all those things, a few nights probably wouldn’t hurt anyone and the architectural design is nice. I filmed a similar unit near the Mighty Buildings headquarters years ago, be warned I had a mustache back then.

Airbus & Audi Engineers Home

Location: Orlando, Florida, USA

Here is another home that looks like polymer printing, supposedly it was built by Airbus and Audi engineers but I am not sure if those companies have any association to this project. Frankly I just found out about this one while searching for 3D printed AirBnbs online. It looks nice with massive windows but as I mentioned I am not a fan of plastic for homes.

Casita Luna

Location: Playa Jeremi, Curaçao

This must be the most beautiful printed AirBnb in the world, located in what looks like a cave like structure right on the beach I can only imagine it’s an incredible experience.

If you’ve enjoyed this article, sign up for the Automate Construction newsletter so you never miss a beat. It’s pretty rare I send emails there is no posting schedule so you can be sure there won’t be a bunch of new slop clogging your inbox.

If you want to get involved with 3DCP yourself, my online course is a great place to start where you can learn the tough truths about the industry and the various equipment required to get started without the bias of one specific printing company telling you their solution is the best.

Opinion: The only true failure at Icon 3D is their PR

Dear Icon 3D,

Engineering is hard.

Maybe harder than anything else in the world.

No reasonably intelligent person expects a brand new technology to work perfectly on the first iteration, hell even the 10th iteration.

Take a look at SpaceX for example (currently worth $350 Billion), I just went to a launch in Boca Chica, Tx and that thing exploded all over Turks and Caicos… but it was a success!

They captured the booster with Godzilla sized chopsticks and the crowd erupted in celebration not only in Isla Blanca state park where I watched it from, but around the world.

What does this have to do with Icon?

EVERYTHING! First of all they have a beautiful building down there at the ad astra school near SpaceX, perhaps the best printed building in the world and yet their trajectory is not quite parallel with SpaceX to say the least. Why does one company blow up rocket after rocket and still continue growing at breakneck speeds while the other had to let go of half their team?

It all comes down to PR.

A company sets their own goalposts with their PR. Icon went fast and cheap with their PR strategy. They checked all the boxes from a AAA rated Apple style marketing campaign from 2010. 60 minutes, CNN, NBC, CBS, Forbes, Bloomberg, Architectural Digest, TechCrunch, Wired, The Verge they did it all!

What did they use these platforms for?

Every single time all they did was sell the vision like it was the present.

Don’t get me wrong that’s a powerful move, one Elon himself has certainly used to inspire millions if not billions on his ambitions for mars but that’s the icing on the cake and you can’t live on icing alone.

A company cannot survive on junk food marketing.

SpaceX thrives after their $50 million dollar rockets explode into smithereens because they did a phenomenal job using their PR to set the right goalposts along the way: Launching a rocket, landing a rocket, reusing a rocket, catching a rocket with giant chopsticks from the sky!

I think you get the point but my criticisms do not end there.

Lets take another look at 2010. Back then people trusted the mainstream media because it’s all we had. You could debate whether you trusted CNN, Fox, or Reuters but that was the end of the story. Today we know all those companies are basically owned by the same people pushing the same narratives. Regardless of your political opinions its impossible not to acknowledge the damage that has been done to traditional media and the current political climate in America is a massive reflection of that. Big media burned the trust of the American people to the point where their word has become an anti-signal, perhaps the strongest one of all.

I saw this coming in 2019 that’s why I set out to build my own independent brand where nobody can tell me what to say. I don’t believe anything that I don’t see in person so I set out to travel the world gathering primary sources of things I am interested in.

That thing was 3D printed construction and construction automation and it still is.

My first videos were out of pure passion and curiosity. I never tried to cater my videos to a specific audience I just tried to film stuff that was interesting to me, low and behold other people appreciated it too. At first not that many people, I would sleep in my car to travel the country to all the very first printed buildings in America and around the world for 2 full years. Eventually I named the brand Automate Construction and made a real business out of it to the point I could afford an apartment to live in, a tesla as my noble steed and a motel 6 anywhere in the country so that I could be anywhere the construction automation was happening.

For 5 full years I never charged a company a dime. With the exception of my trip to Europe I never even accepted travel costs or accommodations because I wanted to preserve the integrity of the brand and it worked! Nobody could tell me what to say, I didn’t get rich but I was free and having a blast, still am!

I’ve reached hundreds of millions of people and grown an audience an order of magnitude larger than Icons itself with nothing but grassroots authenticity and an iPhone with internet connection.

I would have loved to keep doing this forever, I even said on multiple occasions I would never charge companies for my videos.

Icons PR team ruined that.

I moved to Austin Tx because it was the closest proximity to the most 3DCP projects, biggest of all was Icons. I would have filmed with them every week if they let me! I never would have charged them a dime.

SpaceX and Tesla were smart enough to recognize the downfall of big media ages ago. EverydayAustronaut (Tim Dodd), MKBHD, NASAspaceflight, LabPadre, What About it!? (Felix Schlang) Dr. Knowitall, Elle in Space, the list goes on. Sure Elon gave interviews to the mainstream media on occasion too but the coolest stuff all went to the independent content creators first.

This was the vision I had for my relationship with Icon but their PR team wasn’t having it. They wanted to control the narrative and they weren’t even good at it. In fact, I think the narrative created by the Icon PR team is the single defining feature causing them all the trouble they have faced in the past 2 years.

Icon hasn’t given me one opportunity to make a video in the past year. I asked countless times and on the rare occasion their PR team answered me they rejected every offer even though it was totally free to them and I even offered the opportunity to review and delete any segment they didn’t want published in advance.

This is the reason I had to change my business model. If I can’t film every company, especially one of my OG favorites then there is no point in doing it all for free. Because of Icons horrible PR team, I was forced to start charging for my videos.

This has turned out to be an amazing decision, after filming in my style for 5 years companies have come to really appreciate it and even though now they are sponsored videos the companies specifically ask me not to hold back and still give my true opinions. So far they haven’t even asked me to delete anything in the review process which has been super awesome. By charging a flat rate I ensure no company gets special treatment and returning visits to companies I have visited in the past are half off to keep the audience updated on their old friends and reward the companies who were kind enough to let me visit them in the past, some when I had virtually no followers at all.

Enough about me back to Icon.

I’m a big believer that if you aren’t part of the solution you are part of the problem so I am not going to just sit here pointing fingers.

Here is how Icon can fix their PR.

Obviously money is tight (I saw some incredible architects, materials scientists, and other 10/10 people were let go) Get rid of anyone who isn’t a Founder, Coder, Engineer, or Laborer. You don’t need frivolous BS everyone should be getting their hands dirty.

When Jason Ballard comes back, put a camera in his hand. Jason should be the true head of the company not just internally but externally. Post videos directly from his phone to social media, go live, host spaces and let every independent content creator who really gives a shit film stuff.

Authenticity is the name of the game. Don’t be reckless, consult with the lawyers in advance and think very carefully before speaking but DO NOT let the marketing people put their hands on it.

Talk about the monthly goals and let us see you hit them.

Let us see you miss them too.

Show us the spectacular explosions over Turks and Caicos. Sure, some losers will make dumb comments but the real fans like me will stand by you every step of the way through thick and thin. Apple style marketing from 2010 doesn’t work anymore we are living in 2025 and you are building the construction company of 2030.

With great love and admiration,

the Grossest

World of Concrete 2025

It’s that time of year again! World of Concrete is currently one of the biggest gatherings of 3DCP folks all year so I stopped by to see what they are up to (even though I still think WOC should give 3DCP more attention and priority).

This year I am doing an article instead of a video from the event so I got a picture with every 3DCP group I could find! If you see me there next year make sure to stop me and get a picture so I can include you too! Here are all the groups I interacted and what they were up to at the show.

Printera

These guys have started working with SpecMix on their Vertico printer and they are doing great! Check out the non-planar print they brought to the show, they are also currently fundraising on startengine.com (not investment advice). Personally I always throw some fun coupons into 3DCP crowdfunding any opportunity I get no matter what company it is, I don’t think I have missed one yet! They also let me crash at their AirBnb during the show which was a fun switch up from being by myself with my dog. We hit Area 15 while we were in Vegas, it was quite an unexplainable experience!

RIC

RIC was one of 3 groups printing at the show and the only group printing outside with a large scale system that has permitted units under its belt. They brought along their latest generation of printers featuring both wheels AND rails, quite a combo! In addition to the massive Walmart project I visited, I also just got to see a fire resistant ADU they built in California which is obviously more important than ever.

3D Potter

This is the most affordable printer on the market, we actually have one listed on the used printer marketplace JazariBots.com for just $29,000 you can contact the owner on that website. There is a building underway using this printer in Florida, their CEO Danny who invented this system is in his 70s still working as hard as ever to bring about the future of construction! I got to tour their facility and learn how he made most of the original parts for the first one by hand.

Quikrete

This was the 3rd group printing this year at the show, of course printing is my favorite thing to see so hopefully next year we can get more than just 3 printers in action at the show.

Vertico

Surely you all remember Vertico from my very first podcast episode and my trip to Europe, they are exceptionally skilled at layer quality and parametric design. Volker has been crushing it selling a bunch of printers.

MAI

This was my first time meeting Gervin, the CEO and owner of MAI. They are very passionate about digitalization and data collection making them well positioned for the 3DCP industry. MAI makes one of the most popular mixer pumps used in the 3DCP industry. It’s my second favorite product made in Austria!

Sika

Sika had a cool workshop that they allowed me to attend where they had a panel of 5 experts answering questions from the crowd about 3DCP. Sadly I had to run out early because someone called animal control on me for leaving my dog in the car even though it was a pleasant 69 degrees on dog mode! My dog loves the car and I check in on him often with the cameras. Vegas needs to learn more about how Teslas work with dog mode!

After dealing with animal control I got back to the show and got this great picture with Noah, the champion of 3DCP at Sika. He has fostered Sikas participation in 3DCP from the time it was a very small industry and now they have 4 concrete plants distributing 3DCP material in America alone.

Putzmeister

This team has the Karlos printer which is an adaptation of their concrete pump truck specifically made for extruding 3D printed concrete. I haven’t got to see it in action yet so I can’t speak to it’s capabilities but hopefully that will change soon! It was fun to see Matt who was my second podcast guest of all time.

Alquist

Zach was hanging out at the shared Alquist/ RIC booth when we got this picture, they are the exclusive US distributor of the RIC system and now have a leasing program. Their Walmart project was the best of the year in 2024 and they have another one coming up soon which I look forward to visiting.

Ventures Equipment

This mixer pump company has consistently worked with 3DCP companies customizing their product offering to maximize utility for construction automation. They were my first channel sponsor ever in 2021-2022 and without them I am not sure that year of filming would have even been possible. They bring a strong Texan work ethic to the table and have often been seen going above and beyond to deliver.

Mapei

This group didn’t have 3DCP featured at the show this year but as an early contributor to the industry they certainly deserve an honorable mention. Hopefully they revisit their interest in 3DCP!

Gaudi

This group had the best booth at the show for WOC 2024, but in 2025 they didn’t bring their printer. WOC should be more accommodating of 3DCP companies, I hear they charge by the pound for bringing stuff into the show which is completely unfair to the 3DCP companies who want to do big prints. It was still fun to see them, hopefully I can visit one of their projects in America soon. Gaudi is the USA branch of Winsun 3D, the very first company featured on my youtube channel. If you go all the way back to my first 3 youtube videos you will see my visit to their facility from my trip to China.

Terran

This group prints with adobe, potentially my favorite construction material. Danny in the pink hat is the first founder featured on my channel to actually live in a home partially built with his own technology, an achievement I have looked forward to someone reaching for a long time!

Sunnyday Technologies

Nick is a familiar face in 3DCP to many, and I got to sit next to him at the Sika workshop event (until animal control called). He also works for Oshkosh, a company that has been increasing their robotics activity in the construction realm and getting ever so close to a real building bot that I could some day cover on my channel, although as of now it’s mostly scanning/sensor tech which is just outside my niche.

ICE 3DCP

This team recently completed the first 3D printed restaurant in the world, it was my first time meeting them in person but hopefully not the last.

And that’s all folks!

Sorry if we didn’t get a picture together, I know there were more 3DCP folks at the show I didn’t get to see. What did you think of the picture/blog format from the show this year? I think it’s a much better style for conferences compared to a video because nothing that special happens at the conferences anyway. I like to capture true moments of construction automation history on my youtube channel, not sales demos. That said, I still had a blast at the show! In total across the 3 days I walked a full marathon even though I used the boring loop as much as I could and got a few rides on the golf cart from south to north hall. All in all I had a great time at WOC 2025!

Breaking New Ground – Evan Maindonald, GP of Hyperlight Ventures

Some of the long time fans of Automate Construction might know that I love reading! In a world of short form content, few things are more satisfying than spending a multi hour chunk on one topic guided by someone who put immense thought and care intro crafting the journey that is a book, story, or novel.

Evan Maindonald, General Partner of Hyperlight Ventures reached out to me after seeing some of my Linkedin posts on construction tech and asked me to read a pre release copy of his new book “Breaking New Ground”. Evan made his mark on the world in property development from the ground up. His story is an inspirational primary source on deal structuring and risk.

As of today, Nov 20th, you can read it too!

Evan’s tale is one of success but he does not paint the picture with rosy colored glasses, risk is a key component of the book but Evan goes into great detail on creative financing options which create extremely attractive risk profiles for someone with nothing to lose! How can someone with nothing to lose get started in property development? It sounds crazy but there are strategies outlined in the book to do exactly that.

The reason Evan asked me of all people to read his book is because he knows I take a no BS approach to looking at construction technologies. One key aspect of “Breaking New Ground” is an introduction to a variety of forward looking technologies, some previously featured on Automate Construction but most of them I’ve never even had the chance to explore.

Reading “Breaking New Ground” was refreshing because instead of forcing tech on you with wild claims, Evan describes a future of prosperity and progress amplified by digital construction.

Evans VC firm Hyperlight Ventures is an investor in Azure, previously featured on the Automate Construction Podcast. Evan ran a promotional video with Automate Construction for the book. This article is independent of that promotion I am just a fan!

Check out Hyperlight Ventures portfolio company Azure 3D

Every Humanoid Robot 2024

Startups and tech giants around the world are competing to build the best humanoid robot soon I’ll be visiting projects like this in person and interviewing their Founders for now let’s run through all of the competitors in this space and see what they’re up to we’ll start stationary and get more advanced as we go in no particular order.

Want to make sure you know when I find new startups? Sign up for the newsletter!

Ambidex – Naver Labs

A stationary robot that has a cable system so that it’s not too strong. You’re able to interact with the robot as a human being without risking getting crushed, ultimately we want to see these systems in the workforce so their ability to work alongside humans in a safe manner is paramount to their success. This system is teleoperated which means they use some kind of controller or haptic device. This is different from full autonomy.

Realman

One of the few systems I’ve been able to see in person so far called the real man it was at the automate 2024 show in Chicago sorting some blocks on it’s screen you can see the vision processing system it’s using to assess the color.

S1 – Astribot

Controlled with AI instead of teleoperation so you don’t need a human controller. They’ve got it working with food, in every kindergarten computer class they teach you not to have food around computers so it’s particularly impressive when you see robots working in this kind of environment the big question is how long it would last over time?

Kime – Macco

Kime by Mako a robotic bartender that operates within an apparatus containing all the dispensers it needs to run a small business by itself. At first I wasn’t sure whether or not to include stationary systems but this company makes it clear their ambition is to build a full humanoid robot so it’s best to start covering their story early.

Armar 6 – Karlsruhe University

Armar 6 is a project over 14 years old from a German University back then the robots were moving a lot slower and I think they’ve improved some of the design aesthetically too. Even back then their system had the ability to mimic the movement of a person without any kind of controller.

Promobot

another older system is promobot which is in the category of communication robots back then language translation was a big deal these days AI handles that in seconds.

Pepper – Softbank Robotics

SoftBank robotics has two robots on this list the first of which being pepper this is a stationary robot with two arms and a screen. In one case it was paired with an additional apparatus so that it can run a small ice cream business. It’s unclear what the maintenance requirements would be or the longevity of a system like this but it’s certainly exciting to see.

Eve – 1X

now we move on to the humanoid robots on Wheels they don’t quite have legs yet although this company 1X does have a robot in development called Neo that will have legs. Eve is fairly advanced already it’s also able to navigate through a variety of doors course and openings. Like many of the companies on this list advancements in AI have allowed for new levels of software integration and capabilities that were previously untenable. As of March Eve is now able to do tasks like clean things up and even fold clothes which was previously touted as an impossible task for robots. 1X has been around for 10 years and their CEO burnt puts a high priority on safety that’s why the system has a soft body so that if it hits something it won’t be damaging as metal or hard plastic might.

Hector – Laser Robotics

Small robots inherently require less materials and probably will operate with similar software so operating at this level might be useful.

NAO – Softbank Robotics

Soft Bank robotics builds NAO in addition to the ice cream bot we saw earlier. This is much smaller, a biped instead of a stationary system or robot on wheels.

OP3 – Google Deep Mind

Tiny bipeds from Google deepmind a project called op3. The interesting factor here is how they were trained. First they watched real soccer gameplay footage then operated in a virtual environment competing with each other to score goals and through thousands of iterations. Eventually they even picked up on strategies like defense. The simulations are all about trial and error to discover the most efficient ways to move. It’s wild how natural the simulation learned code looks relative to the scripted code.

Ergo Cub – IIT

Ergo is a research project by the Italian Institute of Technology. Ergo Cub is controlled with the ifeel suit, a person wears the full body suit and special shoes which have sensors so that the computer can track the human motions and translate them to the robot along it to be teleoperated.

Hydra

Hydra which was also trained partially in a simulation this system is only legs but the notable aspect is that it’s all Hydro electrostatic actuators. Hydraulic actuators are much stronger than electric actuators but this also makes them more dangerous. Actuators are a fundamental component of humanoid robots as opposed to stepper Motors more commonly used in 3D printing. Actuators come in three main categories hydraulic, electric, or pneumatic some teams are building their actuators in house. I can’t wait to meet some of the experts working with this stuff handson and get their perspective.

4NE1 – Neura Robotics

Neura Robotics brought 4NE1 to the automate 2024 conference but it was just stationary like a statue not doing any kind of tasks they’ve released this video but it’s just a rendering hopefully we get to see some realaction soon but for now they’re not making these for anyone.

Themis – Westwood Robotics

Themis is the full-size humanoid robot from Westwood robotics they also have a small smaller research based robot. This bigger unit isn’t exactly for sale yet but they do have this clever teaser video demonstrating its ability to walk and carry things. It doesn’t have complicated hands yet. Their smaller system Bruce is available for $16,000 and they have a few different $2,000 bonuses if you’re able to complete tasks like flipping and other complex Maneuvers for about that size $16,000 seems pretty expensive 

Nadia – IHMC

Nadia is a research project from the Florida Institute of human and machine cognition and as Floridians would, the first thing they’re teaching it is combat. Nadia is capable of breaking planks and they’ve also trained it to hit a moving pad with gloves. Lately Nadia is working on her dodging skills. When Nadia earns her black belt she might have some serious defense tech applications.

Magicbot – Magic Labs

Magic bot from Magic Labs was one of the last companies to make this list. I had been searching for humanoid robotic companies to include for months and in the final days of preparation stumbled across this company. Their website is just a logo and their YouTube channel has under a thousand subscribers but their humanoid robot seems to have quite dextrous hands that’s even capable of folding clothes. It’s unclear whether this is human operated with a controller or some type of AI capable of these tasks without the human in the loop.

Apollo – Apptronik

First full-size bipedal humanoid robot on this list with hands and dexterity able to walk and lift things on its own. Right now they seem focused on logistics and warehouse operating roles.

CyberOne – Xiaomi

One of many competitive Chinese companies in the humanoid robotic space. Demonstrated the ability to to walk, hold an item and also pass it off to a human in a public conference. Their partnership with Xiaomi means there’s no shortage of manufacturing capacity resources and talent available 

Kepler

It does appear to be a bipedal humanoid but it’s attached to an overhead system and also plugged in perhaps not the most advanced system on the list 

GR1 – Fourier

Fourier intelligence is developing the GR1 with the unique goal of elderly care. I’m going to take a hardline stance here that many of you will disagree with but I think that there’s more than enough people on Earth for companionship and these roles are much better served with real humans rather than robots we need robot workers not robot friends.

CL1 – LimX Dynamics

Limex Dynamics is a collaborative organization with participants from many American and Chinese universities. Altogether they’ve published over 130 papers on the topic of humanoid robots. The cl1 has demonstrated its ability to climb up steps though it was supported with a gantry system and safety cables. I’m always a bit more impressed when they’re confident enough to let the robot operate without supporting cables.

PX5 – Xpeng

Xpeng is a Chinese auto manufacturer and they’ve developed the px5. It seems many auto manufacturers are trying their hand at humanoid robots, perhaps the manufacturing experience they have will help in bringing a technology like this to scale once they figure out how to make them most effective. Not only can it navigate a dynamic floor surface it’s also able to use different navigation methods like a hoverboard so instead of walking it’s just leaning forward and backward. Kind of a roundabout way to get a humanoid robot on Wheels but hey it’s pretty impressive.

Pal – Talos

Pal was initially released by Talos six years ago and lately they’ve been releasing new videos in the past year of it completing new tasks like navigating stairs and surfaces that that are not flat this is in anticipation of helping a system like this leave the warehouse and walk around in the real world. Other systems are already capable of completing this task but for each one they need to go through these learning steps kind of like a toddler so that they’re able to be competent in everyday scenarios out in the real world.

Menteebot – Mentee Robotics

An interesting system that looks much more lean than some of the other robots in this category. It’s an AI first company and they hope the system will be able to learn from people as a mentee. The arms seem quite long relative to the size of the body and it notably has no head. Interesting design choices, personally I appreciate function over form. I can’t wait to learn more about the advantages and disadvantages of the different form factors these systems take on.

H1 – Unitree

Unitree a company which also builds quadruped robots makes the H1 it’s a humanoid robot, it just doesn’t have hands. This system is able to navigate steps and complete tasks like turning around in the narrow scope of the top of these steps. 

G1 – Unitree 

their brand new humanoid robot new and improved and this one as as you can see does include hands it’s weird seeing some of the odd robotic motions they’re capable of I’m sure unry has learned a ton from the H1 and they’ve implemented a lot of those learnings into the G1 it’s able to take quite a beating and still remain upright balancing itself after being punched or pushed in the release video. They say it will be for sale for $16,000 though I’m not sure when it will be commercially available. Unitree also demonstrated how it’s capable of folding up for a sort of transport mode to ne carried by humans. It seems small enough that it could be picked up and moved fairly easily, that said it’s still over 75 lbs so lift with your knees and maybe hit the gym if you haven’t been picking things up in a while. Like we learned earlier systems like this are often trained in simulations. This robot was trained with reinforcement learning simulating motions thousands of times before practicing them in the real world. The robots ability to crack a walnut is kind of intimidating and brings up the question of safety. How strong should the robot be? it’s impressivly able to open a  bottle cap without cracking the glass.

Figure – OpenAI partnership

Figure is among the most competitive and compelling players in the space of humanoid robots. They’ve recently announced a partnership with open AI so that their system can become smarter and adapt to more real world scenarios. Figure has also just raised $650 million to accelerate their progress in developing a humanoid robotic system. Many of their parts including actuators are developed in-house. The CEO Brett Adcock initially started a recruiting firm called Vettery, sold it for $100 million then started Archer an electric air craft firm worth $2.7 billion now he’s started figure and his ambition is to automate human labor. It’s been shown making a coffee which may not seem too complex at first glance but when you consider how many intricacies and possibility for error there is you start to understand why it’s so important to have an artificial intelligence that can adapt to all the different real world scenarios that might arise. If you want to keep up with the latest advancements in software AI their CEO Brett is a great follow on X every Sunday he posts a comprehensive overview of pretty much every major development in the AI software space seems like moving boxes will be the first job of many of these systems.

Optimus – Tesla

The third iteration of robot from Tesla. They’ve been advancing quickly initially unveiling the Bumblebee concept then Optimus gen 1. Recently on X Elon said they’re working on a version which will have 22 degrees of freedom in the hands instead of 11. They’ve got it walking around the factory without any kind of special harness and although the gait may look kind of strange it’s a significant improvement from the earlier walking in both pace and aesthetic. Tesla has two massive advantages when it comes to humanoid robots they’ve got a hardware and manufacturing advantage both in developing things like actuators in-house and producing them at scale. Tesla also has a software advantage because of the AGI behind FSD. If the software can understand the world around it it can navigate through it without causing any harm. Finger sensors allow fragile egg handling (The video did show an egg boiler) without cracks. Considering how much manufacturing Tesla does, they know as well as anybody which roles are important to replace with robots first or which roles might be most suited for a humanoid robot to complete. They’re teaching a humanoid robot to place electric battery cells from a rack into a container and it’s being instructed by humans which are completing the task next to it. After learning the system can become autonomous in real time and has some degree of artificial intelligence to the capacity it’s able to correct when it makes a simple error. Online commenters have mocked this task claiming that battery placement could be done by a cheaper two axis robot but it’s only demonstrating early cap capabilities in a simpler environment things are going to get complex faster than you can imagine 

Phoenix – Sanctuary AI

Phoenix has been developed by Sanctuary AI again with a very high concentration on AI capabilities here it’s demonstrating potential medical applications AI is important in these systems because many simple tasks require higher orders of reasoning for example just emptying a simple grocery bag requires an understanding of the space available in the fridge relative to the objects being put inside which objects can be nudged moved adjusted and what might be fragile or brittle they call their software carbon Ai and it’s developed inhouse designed to blend the benefits of symbolic and neural reasoning while mitigating the challenges of both I’m not a software guy but my interpretation is that means they’re using cameras to understand the world around it and also some type of language model which has an understanding of different objects and their meaning in society 

Walker S – Ubtech

Capable of complex tasks like folding, this Chinese company has integrated a language model so that you can interact with the robot by talking to it and get basic responses. They ask what pants might go good with a shirt the robot folded and the robot replies a dark color would be nice. If you look closely you can see the top left corner of the shirt is not quite folded perfectly. Considering they left this in the final cut of the video I imagine this took many tries. This robot has also been introduced to automotive production enviroments where it’s been employed as an inspection bot testing simple things like the seat belts. Cars and humanoid robots seem separate seated by The hip, almost every major auto manufacturer is either building buying or partnering with some type of humanoid robotics.

THR3 – Toyota

Toyota’s also got a contestant in the humanoid robot race called the THR3. it’s demonstrated having tele-operation with a person wearing typical goggles that we’ve seen other companies use and gloves set up with integrated arms to control the robot. THR3 is able to do tasks like manipulate arubber ball without losing grip on it.

Surena IV – University of Tehran

University of Tehran is among the groups working on humanoid robots for an extended period per of time, this experience has culminated into Serena 4 their latest iteration of humanoid robot that seems to be able to copy human movements and complete a variety of tasks which include drilling. This is particularly exciting for our long-term audience because they know automation in construction is our primary concentration. I ultimately believe humanoid robots are going to be important on construction sites around the world, especially in areas with skilled labor shortages. Seeing a robot that can drill is one step closer to that construction automation dream. This robot’s also able to write its own name about as well as I could. With some handwriting and construction classes this could get interesting 

Robonaut – NASA

Project over a decade old which they supposedly were going to send to space to help the astronauts, though I couldn’t find any footage of the system operating in space conditions.

Digit – Agility Robotics

Digit by Agility Robotics is starting with logistics and warehouse tasks, mostly picking and placing objects with its claw-like hands. They’ve made a deal with Amazon where they’re testing its capabilities in their Logistics departments Amazon employs over 750,000 robots and every year they’ve been accumulating more and more. An interesting aspect of this system is the reverse folding legs. Instead of bending forward the knee bends backward and there’s an additional support structure from the back of the knee to the gluteus maximus.

Atlas – Boston Dynamics

With hydraulic actuators, this system was among the first humanoid robots to walk and by far the most capable that people had seen in the past decade. It was capable of dynamic motion, flips, and a variety of services. Boston Dynamics was purchased by Google then sold to Hyundai and last week when they announced that Atlas would be retiring it was really a sad thing to see them giving up.

Atlas 2 – Boston Dynamics

It turns out they weren’t giving up on humanoid robots just hydraulic actuators they would move to Electric actuators in Atlas 2 for their back drivable capabilities which are much more applicable for the human task humanoid robots will be replacing I can’t wait to see what Atlas 2 has in store for us.

3D Printing Concrete Directly From Mixer Truck

Is on site batch plant mixing obsolete?

I recently spent 3 weeks in Calgary Canada commuting daily into the indigenous territory of the Siksika nation where Nidus 3D was printing the 3rd and 4th quadplexes from their 16 unit pilot project in the region.

On the first visit in 2023 Nidus was using the batch plant mixer on their Cobod system and for many reasons including the extreme climate the batch plant mixer had substantial challenges. On separate occasions during my first visit, the generator and pump both had issues which ended the day of printing.

This time around Nidus has implemented a new solution I had never before seen in person which has the potential to dramatically increase availability of printable material and reduce labor on site. Instead of hydrating the dry mix on site Nidus worked with Lafarge to batch mix the custom concrete at the Lafarge concrete plant an hour away and have it delivered in a regular mixing truck. From the truck, material is deposited into a pump which has sufficient precision to feed the printer. Long term one could imagine a truck which has a more precise pump as a built in feature.

The primary issue with this strategy is the length of time the truck is required on site. Typically these trucks dump their load as quickly as possible so they can move on to the next job site and make more money. Often they charge an hourly rate so keeping the truck on site through an entire print day may be very costly.

The key benefit to this strategy is reducing on site labor. By outsourcing material mixing and hydration, larger concrete companies which benefit from economies of scale handle one of the dirtiest parts of the job. When cementitious material arrives hydrated it dramatically reduces the airborne silica dust on site making for safer working conditions.

One way to preserve the benefits of off site mixing while navigating hourly concrete truck charges could be some material silo which can hold the wet mix in a printable state through agitation or chemical means so that the truck can go back to fill up instead of waiting on site.

Kudos to Nidus 3D for continuing to push boundaries driving construction automation forward through the challenging process of innovation. The future of technology will not come from people copying the status quo, it will arrive from the hands of those willing to try new things which have never been achieved before.

Being in the region so long I got to see many processes not previously featured on this platform including expanding spray foam insulation, pouring a bond beam, placing window and door lintels to facilitate printed concrete overhangs and more. We even got a glimpse of utilities for the gantry system besides just the printing itself.

Here’s all the best footage from my trip.

Construction Automation Advancing On All Fronts: ICON SXSW 2024

Automate construction. It’s a simple sentence. Short. What it conveys may be the single most important realm of progress to uplift humanity on a global scale. 

Rising housing costs, increasing natural disasters, aging labor forces… AI won’t fix that in the cloud, only manufacturing can. 

Nearly every industry has been completely transformed in the past 10 years, yet construction automation still occupies under one percent of the current industry in 2024. The obvious answer for this: it’s still in development. Every facet and aspect of the technology requires improvements before it reaches significant market penetration.

Sound overwhelming? Not for Icon. Yesterday I got the opportunity to attend their 2024 SXSW presentation. I don’t know what I was expecting, but they delivered. Hardware, software, materials; they demonstrated improvements on all fronts. This is exactly the type of leadership the industry needs, companies working tirelessly to improve every aspect of their systems. Digital marketplaces, AI design software, projects reaching new heights, and even teasers for future robotics… Let’s get into it.

ICON kicked off the event with a story about cost improvements. On their first project, it was over $300/sqft just for the wall segment which included outer and inner portions of the wall, reinforcement, insulation and finishings. They gradually decreased the price with the goal of beating the standard $35/sqft cost of stick built houses (for the wall section). The progress they’re making is incredible but I don’t think analyzing merely the wall segment captures the full story. Concrete is a very heavy material. This makes 3-D printed buildings extremely strong – able to withstand incredible wind loads. The weight also increases the foundation requirements, an added cost which I don’t believe was reflected in their estimate. There could be other discrete cost adjustments associated with printing vs. stick built construction outside the wall structure.

With their brand new system, they estimate costs could potentially be reduced to just $24 per square foot of wall segment. This difference may be enough to compensate for increased foundation requirements but until the project is completed, we won’t know. Construction estimates are notoriously unreliable. 

Carbon X was announced at this event as well. Though sparse on details, they announced a public MIT Whitepaper, claiming the lifetime carbon emissions of a 3-D printed house or lesser than any comparable method.

The primary Takeaway from the study is that 3-D printed homes have between 2%- 6% lower lifetime carbon emissions than a stick built home. Reading the study I was surprised to see they gave both the same 75 year expected service life. I’m glad they did the math this way, though I hope a printed home would have more longevity than its stick build equivalent. Here is the recipe from the study, I will make some assumptions on what the ingredients could have been below.

  • Type 1L cement: 15.56% wt, 517 lb/CY
  • Supplementary cementitious materials: 5.69% wt, 189 lb/CY
  • Mineral fillers: 9.87% wt, 328 lb/CY
  • Aggregates: 58.01% wt, 1927 lb/CY
  • Liquid admixtures: 0.84% wt, 28 lb/CY
  • Mineral admixtures: 0.66% wt, 22 lb/CY
  • Water: 9.36% wt, 311 lb/CY

SPECULATION DISCLAIMER

  • Typically I do my best to report on things which are verifiably factual to preserve the longevity of my content as a historical reference, however today, I will breach my fact preferring ethos to speculate on what the CarbonX recipe might be. I am not a civil engineer, nor a material scientist, so you can consider this a layman guess.

First of all, it’s incredible to see only 15.56% portland cement, I have never seen this number so low in any 3DCP recipe anywhere.  Putting our Sherlock Holmes hat on, let’s try to figure the rest out. Supplementary cementitious materials are likely certainly fly ash or slag based on the  kg C02 eq/lb reported. In the MIT study these are listed as .008 kg C02 eq/lb but I do not subscribe to the calculations used to estimate fly ash or slag production because they are a byproduct of other carbon intensive processes which do not have the total production capacity necessary to transition the world to construction automation with these materials. If fly ash or slag were ever produced intently beyond its current capacity as a byproduct the CO2 impact would be astounding. Let it be noted that I pay no heed to any environmental calculations, I am not convinced protecting the environment is as simple as the management of one single molecule. True environmental protection would require an omniscience far beyond human capacity thus any ‘guidance’ from whatever powers that be are likely to be revised in the future as we learn more about the full picture.

It’s likely the mineral fillers are finely ground fly ash as well given the low kg C02 eq/lb reported and the qualifying statement in Table 1 of the MIT whitepaper regarding energy required for grinding the material. Silica fume is also a pretty good guess for this material as it also has a lower kg C02 eq/lb. Other common mineral fillers are limestone powder or quartz powder but both require too much energy to fit the bill of .0012 kg C02 eq/lb. 

The aggregates are sand and perhaps small gravel likely all below 4mm perhaps as low as 2mm. Liquid admixtures are probably an accelerant often mixed with the material near the exit of the printer head or extruder to assist with buildability without limiting flow through the small diameter (2-4 inches) concrete hose. Mineral admixtures typically refers to fly ash, silica fume, slag, metakaolin or rice husk ash. 

Next, we move on to CodeX. Think of it as Icon’s version of the App Store, but instead of digital apps, they sell 3-D printed houses. Currently, there are a plethora of options in well thought out categories like Texan, storm resistant fire, resistant tiny homes, and even some multi million dollar compounds. Architects and designers will be able to submit their designs and receive commissions each time their design is used. You can check out their existing models for yourself via their website in this link below, mind you the intro video is surprisingly long before the “start exploring” button appears, so be patient.

It’s unclear whether these models will ever be available for printing on non-icon printers. I expect they will continue with their Apple style ecosystem and keep everything within their walled garden.

This wasn’t the only software innovation icon had to announce that day,, Vitruvius.ai is their brand new AI powered design tool for both traditional buildings and 3-D printed houses alike. Although most of the verbiage on the website is limited to residential projects, I decided to challenge the system by asking for a 3D printed four unit apartment complex above a commercial retail operation with a restaurant and two stores and I was astounded to see it delivered not one, but three different renderings of what that 3-D printed building may look like. It’s my understanding the model was trained only on residential projects so this was a great surprise. CEO Jason Ballard noted they had the option to turn creativity for the AI system off, and improve the floor plan results in relation to the printed buildings, however eliminating creativity yielded far less exciting results, so they left some in.

Some of the challenges are obvious based on the data being limited to existing residential homes. It’s incredibly rare to see round angles on the house yet all the best 3-D printed building designs implement this feature. Likely because of this, the floorplans are hard, right angles or 45° angles never rounded. Another challenge was with the commercial building, obviously outside the scope described for this AI software. In the current stage, the first floor commercial operation, though accurate in the renderings, showed up as a typical residential building with kitchen, bedrooms, and bathrooms on the floor plan. The trajectory for AI is blistering fast. I’m sure with the right data sets, this software will improve very quickly. With enough models for curved floor plans in CodeX, Vitruvius.AI will get the data it needs to fix this problem. It was funny to see Icon announce CodeX and foreshadow its obsolescence all in one presentation.

Finally, we get to the Phoenix printer addressing many of the pain points in icons gantry style printer the Vulcan. This was the most exciting part of the presentation. You all know I’m hardware oriented, and nothing is more exciting than the robots that build. Gantry systems significant set up time, downtime, calibration challenges, and their size makes them difficult to transport, not to mention building at height becomes a wobbly experience. Icon has announced the Phoenix printer; a boom system on tracks, with a self leveling system on the printhead. lasers to identify its position and compensate for any sway in the boom. This new system has a much faster set up and take down time and with self driving, it would be able to navigate itself from one job site to the next. With a total height of 70 feet, Icon claims that it should be capable of printing two-story, perhaps even three-story structures. My favorite feature on this new system is an automatic reinforcement placing apparatus, though not yet demonstrated.

That wasn’t the end of icon hardware announcements, though the last one is incredibly sparse on the details. There was a brief mention of task bot systems developed for special use cases. We could speculate this could be flooring, painting, lighting, or scanning. At the most advanced level, someday, even plumbing or electrical work may be taskbot applications. 

The event was also used to award Initiative 99 winners from around the globe, in two categories, student and professional. About a quarter of the million dollar prize purse has been awarded to the six winners, with the rest reserved for future phases of this project. 

Make sure to sign up for the newsletter below in order to stay updated on the latest automate construction news. The new bill banning TikTok grants the President power to shut down any website which does not comply with their expectations, but even if every platform I operate on gets shut down, I’ll still be able to continue pursuing the mission to automate construction with you if you choose to share your email with me.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Automate Construction Power Ranking 2024

First of all I would like to congratulate everyone who made this list, I spend all my time keeping both eyes peeled on the latest construction automation projects and in the past 5 years of following the industry I’ve accumulated nearly 400 companies who I believe are paving the road to construction automation. 

For this list I have selected the 50 companies which caught my attention the most to rank on the following factors: Activity, Funding, Commercialization, Code Compliance, Innovation, Reliability, Publicity, and Construction. Each company received a 1-5 rating in each category. Bear in mind as a just one person I am limited in my ability to fully assess each metric of every company, I likely have many inaccuracies or blind spots. 

Here is how I assessed each category, keep in mind I can only judge what I have seen. I am also not a qualified judge. This is just for fun, certainly not financial advice especially considering the valuation of the companies is not something I considered in the rubric.

Next year many of these companies will be knocked out of the top 50 based on the strong newcomer projects yet to be announced for 2024! It’s incredibly exciting to watch this industry grow at a blistering pace with all the novel achievements, and bitter failures bound to happen along the way!

Here are the 2024 contenders. Remember these are the top 50 out of 400, just making the list is a significant achievement with lots of excellent companies shy of the 50 most powerful. If you would like to know how the Automate Construction Power Ranking system works scroll to the bottom for the rubric. 

Mighty Buildings | Power Ranking: 14 

Makes the list for their substantial fundraising and PR despite a relatively low number of delivered units. UV cured polymers and plastic in general are lesser than concrete, mortars, or adobe in my opinion.

R-Squared | Power Ranking: 15 

Young start up from Texas operating a Black Buffalo system, promising activity but too early for a mature power ranking.

Muddy Robots | Power Ranking: 16 

Adobe printing company started by Berkley Prof. Ronald Rael using local dirt, clay, and straw for unique structures with various new patterns. Existing building codes in many states stipulate a much lower psi requirement for adobe structures vs concrete.

Black Buffalo | Power Ranking: 16 

Printer manufacturer from South Korea who is fairly well funded and operates a unique system which has yet to be fully tested in the field though they do have some impressive permitted projects in Virginia.

Laticrete | Power Ranking: 16 

Materials company that operates a concrete printing arm, and they’ve been interested in the industry for years working with printed farms and others.

RIC | Power Ranking: 16 

Chinese company partnered with Kuka to provide robotic arm concrete printers, notably innovative for their vertically integrated mixing system.

Mudbots | Power Ranking: 17 

Concrete printer company with some virality in 2017, 2018 but no publicly announced completed projects. Innovative mixing R&D, yet lack of demonstrations is concerning.

Sq4D | Power Ranking: 17 

Early contender with a unique self assembling V one printer, hopefully they are working on their V2 however there’s been little to no activity. High publicity and innovation score, low in other metrics.

TAM | Power Ranking: 17 

Besides Laticrete this company has the highest commercialization among those previously mentioned. They’ve successfully sold multiple large printers around the globe.

Tvasta | Power Ranking: 17

 This concrete printing company operates in India and they have done an exceptional job adapting and developing unique solutions for their region with local materials, developing their own printer.

Vertico | Power Ranking: 17

High commercialization high activity and high reliability, vertico does great work but they have very little interest in construction.

Geopolymer International | Power Ranking: 18 

Highest yet on the innovative scale for their unique implementation of Geo polymer material which is a silica-based binder. No completed construction projects.

Contour 3D | Power Ranking: 19 

Among the highest yet mentioned in code compliance, this Aussie printing company completed a permitted addition to a building.

Figure | Power Ranking: 19 

Promising humanoid robot start up with potential to assist on job sites with simple tasks in 2 to 5 years. Top score for innovation and funding but a 1 out of 5 in activity, commercialization and construction because all of their energy is in R&D at the moment.

Heidelberg | Power Ranking: 19 

Materials company investing into printed concrete formulation notably innovative for managing the European concrete laws which stipulate cement concentration maximums in concrete far below what most printing companies use elsewhere.

MAI | Power Ranking: 19 

Mixing company with a mixing system used on some concrete printing sites which has plastic compartments for mixing making it easier to disassemble and power wash. Hopefully as the industry grows they put more attention towards their construction automation arm.

Wasp 3D | Power Ranking: 19 

Four out of five for innovation due to their unique choice of material, local dirt which can be much cheaper than concrete. Unfortunately they have a low number of true construction projects.

Additive Techtonics | Power Ranking: 20 

Additive tectonics gets a four out of five in code compliance and innovation for their utilization of a powder bed for printing quite different from the systems all other companies on this list are currently using. Low construction activity brings them down in other areas of this ranking system.

Besix 3D | Power Ranking: 20 

Small arm of a large construction company Besix, this team scores well in code compliance reliability and construction.

FIBO | Power Ranking: 20 

Construction equipment company scoring high in commercialization code compliance and construction but low in other areas.

M-Tech | Power Ranking: 20 

Concrete mixing company serving the most 3-D printed concrete sites scoring high in commercialization and construction. Disappointing progress and investment into their 3DCP products considering the market expansion.

Macro 3D | Power Ranking: 20 

Concrete printer developed by young entrepreneur scoring a 4 in innovation for their unique system.

Print4d | Power Ranking: 20

Ex Besix founder who started his own company developing his own system from scratch scoring high in reliability and commercialization, successfully selling printers but no publicized construction projects yet.

XTreee | Power Ranking: 20 

French printer company developed their own system from scratch scoring high in commercialization and a respectable 2 or 3 in all other categories.

UTU | Power Ranking: 20 

Promising Ukrainian start up with a completely unique system, admittedly I have a lack of insight here as they are the newest to me among these 50.

Harcourt | Power Ranking: 21

Lots of training and R&D activity, high reliability low number of construction projects. 

Hyperion | Power Ranking: 21

Respectable scores in all categories, four out of five in innovation for their factory in the field concept with an inflatable tent.

MiCob | Power Ranking: 21 

Unique concrete printer developed in India with successful construction projects and military contracts.

Sika | Power Ranking: 21 

Materials company scoring twos and threes across the board.

3D Plotter | Power Ranking: 21.5 

Scara printer developed for mostly clay or Adobe but capable of printing mortar mixes as well, yet to be seen on construction sites but highest yet for commercialization. They have sold dozens of printers and been a great tool for many people getting started.

Bemore3D | Power Ranking: 22 

Unique printer manufacturer from Spain with successful projects in Africa, scoring high in innovation.

Winsun 3D | Power Ranking: 23 

Early concrete printing company with massive R&D in 2016-2020 but fewer projects announced since, hopefully more coming soon.

Apis Cor | Power Ranking: 23

In house printer, mixing system, and delivery truck, this company scores high in innovation for a vertically integrated system and a top score in publicity.

Constructions 3D | Power Ranking: 23 

French printer manufacture scoring high in innovation with a three in all other categories besides commercialization and publicity where they currently sit at a 2 out of 5.

Cybe | Power Ranking: 23 

Printer manufacture with successful projects around the globe scoring high in activity and innovation. 

Hive | Power Ranking: 23 

Texas printing company with a very busy year scoring high in activity and innovation for their on site mixing truck.

14 Trees | Power Ranking: 24 

African printing company scoring a four in innovation and construction for completing over 10 units with a competitors system then developing their own printer in house.

Cobod | Power Ranking: 24 

Danish printer manufacture with systems operating in the most countries around the globe however their sales strategy resembles a multi level marketing scheme with the goal of turning customers into paid distributors. 

Mense Korte | Power Ranking: 24 

Architecture firm with multiple projects pushing boundaries of printing possibilities scoring very high in commercialization and code compliance also reliability and construction. Low scores in activity and funding, 3DCP is not their daily focus and architecture firms don’t require upfront capital like construction.

Mobbot | Power Ranking: 24 

French company with triple fours in commercialization code compliance and innovation, civil projects are great use cases for their printing system but no building construction.

Nidus 3D | Power Ranking: 24 

Canadian printing companies scoring high in innovation and construction for printing in challenging conditions with novel solutions.

PERI | Power Ranking: 27 

Major construction equipment company with triple fours in commercialization code compliance and innovation and a whopping five in construction for their legacy projects and boundary pushing printed buildings.

Printed Farms | Power Ranking: 27 

Four out of five in commercialization, innovation, publicity and construction for completing some of the earliest US projects and the biggest printed building in the world.

Fastbrick Robotics | Power Ranking: 27 

Top score in innovation for their one-of-a-kind bricklaying system also a four out of five in funding publicity and construction.

Emergent 3D | Power Ranking: 28 

California printer operator with good commercial activity and very skilled with construction in a challenging region with full permitting.

Botbuilt | Power Ranking: 28 

Robotic arm based automated framing system for pre-fabricated parts with a top score in code compliance considering the finished product is indistinguishable from legacy construction methods.

Diamond Age | Power Ranking: 29 

Top score in funding and innovation also ranking high in construction and activity this team has implemented the most in-house construction automation tools on site of any company on this list.

Built Robotics | Power Ranking: 29 

This company makes large construction equipment like dozers typically operated by one human and automates it so that the machine can complete the same task without the person inside. They score 4 in nearly every category.

Boxabl | Power Ranking: 31 

Boxable makes a pre-fabricated unfolding house that has recently received Arizona code compliance and hopes to expand this nationally they earn top scores in funding and publicity also very high in innovation

Icon | Power Ranking: 33 

Very active on site builder utilizing completely novel methods operating many printers on a day-to-day basis, top score in funding, innovation and publicity, fours in all categories besides commercialization and code compliance where they got a respectable 3. Due to great fundraising and government contracts it is not clear what level their commercialization is and they have a limited region of operation in TX with more relaxed permitting departments than other states.

***please see the rubric and disclosure below***

POWER RANKING RUBRIC

Activity

How busy is the company or tech working directly on construction automation projects?

  1. No current projects
  2. Small activity
  3. Daily building
  4. Notably high activity 
  5. Scaled multi team 24 hr activity (None yet achieved)

Funding

How much access to capital does the company have

  1. Bootstrapped
  2. Pre Seed
  3. Seed
  4. 10M+
  5. 100M+

Commercialization

Is the company doing projects, selling systems, and operating like a typical contractor

  1. No commercial revenue
  2. Small or subsidized commercial revenue
  3. At least some work is sold with the expectation of profit
  4. Regularly doing projects with expectation of profit
  5. Gold rush (None yet achieved)

Code Compliance

Is the product sold following typical codes and regulations permissible everywhere?

  1. No code is followed in any projects or project ending non compliance
  2. Light local restrictions allow activity
  3. Permitted projects in typical regions
  4. Permitted projects in extra challenging regions
  5. Identical to traditional methods in ease of permitting

Innovation

Is the company doing new things all the time?

  1. No notable improvements over last year
  2. Small progress
  3. Clearly innovating
  4. Wildly unique
  5. Vertically integrated innovation

Reliability

Does the company follow through on promised projects, predictions, and products? 

  1. Multiple cases of no follow through
  2. Typical startup challenges
  3. Consistently delivers
  4. Exceptional delivery & delivery rate
  5. Top tier reliability (None yet achieved)

Publicity

Do people know the company exists?

  1. Why are you so secret? Get the word out!
  2. Minor publicity
  3. Substantial publicity
  4. Above average media exposure
  5. Enormous PR 

Construction

Do they build stuff and operate like a normal construction company or construction equipment provider?

  1. Operating like early startup
  2. Some construction 
  3. Contractor or commercial equipment provider
  4. Experienced GC
  5. Major construction player

Reach out via the contact tab on this website if you have any questions regarding this list.

Disclosure: I own small equity positions in some of the companies mentioned from public Reg A offerings. My investment does not reflect my opinion on the quality of the investment, I gamble on every public Reg A offering I can find and afford in the construction automation industry. I have never accepted payment from any company on this list for videos or appearance on this list. Companies I hold positions in from public Reg A offerings include Boxabl, Apis Cor and multiple others which do not appear on this list. It should be made clear that I am not a professional investor and see these as a gamble with no consideration for the outcome. So far I have invested in every construction automation company available publicly via Reg A that I find simply because they do construction automation and for no other reason. Seriously, my least favorite company on the list of 400 could do a reg A offering and I would still invest if they had a reasonable minimum investment that I could afford. Was this a legal enough disclosure? I don’t know it’s more about personal journalistic ethics for me anyway please don’t arrest me love you all.

Zacua Ventures Construction Robotics Market Map

The construction industry is a very large industry, yet it has remained laggard in terms of innovation and automation. Zacua Ventures is a global early-stage venture fund tackling world’s biggest challenges across Sustainability, Productivity and Urbanization and backed by the most innovative corporates in the built world. Zacua is led by partners with more than 30 years of combined industry experience, and who have been investing in construction tech for the past decade. They partner with top-tier corporates in this space across the globe and enable or portfolio companies to connect with them seamlessly. With regional presence in San Francisco, Madrid, and Singapore, Zacua helps entrepreneurs to build and strengthen their value proposition and scale their businesses globally, leveraging deep corporate networks.  Zacua ventures has been able to identify four major trends that is leading to the adoption of robotics in the construction industry and through their network of industry leaders, they drive value and accelerate growth for their partners and entrepreneurs by providing access to new technology, strategic insights into emerging trends, and unequaled scalability. The four major trends are leading to the adoption of Robotics in construction are:

  • Labor Shortage: This is majorly as a result of lack of interest, in terms of construction by the younger generation. The older generation is getting closer to retirement, with no one to fill up their empty roles, which also leads to lack of skilled workers
  • Unsustainability: More precisely the production of cement, is one of the causes of global co2 emission. Although the public has become more aware of the consequences and regulations have been put in place, it still calls for the need of a better solution.
  • New capabilities in robotics
  • New business model

Zacua ventures has published a report on companies, they deem notable in the construction technology space. The report mentions companies that deal on onsite production and pre-fab in the various aspects of building construction.

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION

Bricklaying

The automation phase in the construction industry is not only limited to 3D printing, bricklaying with clay and concrete masonry products to construct brickwork and blockwork. Bricklayers’ scope of work ranges from residential to commercial, from straight walls to ornamental walls, and from structural to non-load bearing walls. Time consumption and lack of labour has 3 companies: Fastbrick robotics, general systems and construction robotics to develop machines that can accelerate this process.

  • Construction Robotics: Construction Robotics provides advanced, labor saving solutions proven to reduce on site injuries and increase productivity so builders can improve safety, enhance the effectiveness of every team member and finish projects on time and on budget. They have been able to develop a robot that builds walls and various parts of a building using bricks and blocks. The robot can lay over 3000 bricks a day without making mistakes and of course getting tired. The robot is able to perform these operations with the use of sensors. The robot has a sensor that detects a laser, which is mounted to the wall in a pole system. The robot also measures the mortar and applies it to the brick before placing it. Human input is still required in finishing touches and feeding the system with bricks and mortar as it works along the scaffold.
  • Fast Brick: The Hadrian X, an automated end-to-end bricklaying robot, was invented by FBR Ltd. It works as a 3D printer, building brick constructions in place, course by course, with adhesive to hold the bricks together. Because to Dynamic Stabilisation Technology (DST), which instantly measures and adjusts for dynamic interference generated by uncontrolled external circumstances, the Hadrian X can work in outdoor locations. Hadrian X performs the automatic loading, cutting, routing, and placing of all bricks in accordance with a computer-aided design, allowing for the completion of a house’s end-to-end bricklaying in as little as three days. Following a successful proof-of-concept with the Hadrian 105 technology demonstration in 2015, the first commercial version was scheduled to be delivered in 2017.
  • General systems : This also a bricklaying robotic company, who actually changes the type of masonry you can lay, it doesn’t lay bricks, it lays messenger blocks which are much larger and more difficult to handle by doing this it actually augment capacity in terms of laying larger structures.

Flooring

Flooring is the general term for a permanent covering of a floor, or for the work of installing such a floor covering. Zacua has two different type of startups

  • Easy flooring robotics: Easy flooring robotics believes that, like mosaic floors, a number of construction contractors that tile floors will disappear from mainstream and will become obsolete. The need for distinctive, seamless, and durable floors grows year after year, particularly in the commercial sector. Easy flooring Robotics is a startup that has created a revolutionary way to build flooring technology. These robots will create a plethora of designs by producing extremely efficient floor casting with innovative materials. It saves traditional execution time by around 50% and eliminates unnecessary workforce.

Dry wall, plastering and painting

These 3 categories are similar and have similar issues, these processed are very repetitve and involve use of unfriendly chemicals. These are very labor-intensive tasks, which causes reduced labor, because people aren’t willing to do the task. Repetitive processes can be easily automated, making these processes safer, faster and more efficient. Some startups like canvas have taking the responsibility of fixing this issues by developing a drywall finishing robot. 

DRY WALL

  • Canvas: Canvas, a startup in construction robotics, has shown a drywall finishing robot. In addition, the firm established its Innovation Partner Program, a creative alliance with six industry-leading contractors that share the company’s mission of “building in bold new ways by placing better tools in the hands of competent employees.” The canvas drywall finishing robot, which can finish enormous areas of drywall semi-autonomously, is changing the way some drywall teams work. The drywall robot, according to Canvas CEO Kevin Albert, concentrates on large expanses, high-volume parts, and difficult-to-reach locations such as high ceilings and corners.The robot’s telescoping mast allows its arm to reach heights of up to 17 ft.The machine can handle the application of the finishing compound and the sanding of it, But human inpus are still required do the taping and handle the more complex geometries. The telescoping pole of the robot allows its arm to reach heights of up to 17 feet. The machine can apply the finishing compound and sand it, but human intervention is still required for taping and handling more difficult geometries.
  • PaintJet: Despite the labor shortage, the demand for painting services have continually increased. Painting is tedious, especially when it involves moving from one place to other and it becomes a dangerous activity because people have to climb on ladders to climb on ladders do the painting, come down move the ladders and keep repeating the same process. When developing a robot in this space, one would have to consider Mobility platforms, injection mechanisms, post control when it comes finishing and consistency of finish. PaintJet is a robotics and material sciences company automating large-scale commercial and industrial painting, it is a mobile lift attachment, designed to quickly apply paint or industrial coatings. This allows for more projects to be completed with lower labor costs. The PaintJet unit is designed to fit a variety of industry standard man lift baskets, so no special equipment is needed to operate the system. Designed with the construction operating environment in mind, PaintJet operates by connecting to industry standard equipment already on site, can be set up and taken down in 30 minutes and is mobile enough to be transported in a pickup or small trailer.
  • Okibo: Okibo, is automating interior construction. They focusing more on painting so they have a full stack built robot which is able applied to apply paint and it can do it both on roofs as well as on walls.
  • Hausbots: Hausbots is a very standard of painting robot, This robot is mostly used for in-house paintings rather than external paintings

Layout

Layout is another interesting category that is now automated. Layout takes about 30% of the time of any task being carried out. It mostly involved measurements, which means measuring tools like tape measure etc. It’s mostly a 2 people job that is done manually, therefore it is time consuming. Layout robots ingests the plans and automatically lays it on site, whether it be day or night, therefore reducing time it takes to do it , when done manually.

  • Dusty Robotics: Dusty uses a laser pointer in terms of doing the marking, based on the laser pointer it can go in different directions, it can gets the job done on most flat surfaces, it doesn’t do walls it doesn’t do the roofs. The dusty robots Eliminate rework and spot issues sooner. The FieldPrinter prints full scale with 1/16” (1 mm) accuracy, ensuring all installed material is within tolerance. Any improperly installed penetrations also become apparent sooner in the schedule, allowing more time for corrections.
  • Civ Robotics: Civbots doesn’t layouts  indoors, it works on large solar projects or large infrastructure projects, staking is a very manual activity and this just drops markers where the stakes need to go in and does it at a in a very precise manner so this is more like outdoor. Civ Robotics helps to significantly increase productivity on heavy civil projects by completing tasks faster, with greater accuracy, and enable teams to operate at peak performance levels.

Drilling and fastening

Drilling and fastening are one of the most prevalent applications on job sites, whether you are anchoring, building etc. it requires these two applications. For very critical jobs like curtain walls were fastening become quite dangerous because of the anchor channels, the risks involved is higher. Some companies have come up with technological solutions to reduce these risks and reduce time spent doing them.

  • Hilti robot: Hilti Group released new features to the Hilti Jaibot, a semi-autonomous, mobile-drilling robot in 2022. The Jaibot is a semi-automated construction robot designed for mechanical, electrical, plumbing and interior finishing installation work. The Hilti Jaibot integrates with your BIM designs to handle the overhead marking and drilling for mechanical, electrical, and plumbing applications up to 16.5 feet high. It pairs with the PLT 300 rotary laser to keep track of its drilling arm within 1/8 of an inch. Technically, it’s a semi-autonomous system. While it doesn’t require an expert to use, it does require human input and oversight.
  • ABB: Elevator installations require anchor bolts in the elevator shaft to precisely and safely fasten guide rails and access doors.Working safely and correctly requires high accuracy and full concentration. ABB has come up with a solution for this by automating the process. The robot’s primary task is to drill holes and install anchor bolts in elevator shafts. The robot scans the shaft wall to determine if there is hidden rebar underneath or if the concrete surface is uneven. The installation system uses an algorithm to calculate tolerances and repositions the holes as necessary.

Wielding and Rebar

Wielding operations is a very expensive operation that requires very skilled operators,that’s why carrying it out using robots is very helpful in construction nevertheless it’s a little bit more complicated because welding involves fire and heating elements and so on  safety the requirements are a little bit higher. A lot of Rebar on the other hand is to build rebar cages, and the process involves bending and tying of rebar, which can be done onsite as well as offsite.

  • Toggle: Toggle uses industrial robotics to pre-assemble rebar offsite and deliver it in record time, build ready-made rebar cages in factories and they ship them to site.

Most of the robots developed for this process have slightly different kind of operation, but all have the same goal, which is to make the process more efficient, safer and faster.

It is very interesting, that there are various aspects of construction advancing into automation, and no one really knows how far till the whole process is fully automated. Having a fully automated process in construction means, having robots communicate with each other. It can be said that the industry is still undergoing its first phase, which is how to use the current technologies developed to its full potential of solving problems.

The automation of the construction industry is still in a quite early stage, but it’s getting closer and close with time to being fully automated.

Check out the full podcast episode this article was based on with Automate Construction founder Jarett Gross

Botbuilt: Framing Robots Automating Construction

The housing crisis is one of the most pressing issues confronting society today. Innovation is the only means of resolving the world wide housing crisis. Companies have come up with various methods and solutions to solve this crisis, amongst many BotBuilt has come up with a solution. BotBuilt was founded by Brent Wadas along with his two business partners Barrett Ames and Colin Devine

BotBuilt is a technology based company whose Headquarters is in Durham, North Carolina. It is one of the leading robotics company that uses robotic systems to solve, complex construction problems. BotBuilt aims to solve the problem of Housing shortage in America, by bringing manufacturing innovation of mass production to homes, by utilizing adaptable, efficient robotic systems, specialized hardware, and cutting-edge software and making it possible for homes to be custom made by Robotics arms. This framework enables robotic precision, which enhances productivity, scalability, sustainability, and safety. In BotBuilt’s Durham warehouse, their robot arms build each home framing.

When it comes to building a house, Framing gives your home a shape and structure, it also impacts the quality of nearly every aspect of your home, from mechanicals to interior and exterior finishes. It is also one of biggest time consuming process in construction, one of the highest cost bearing process as far as material cost goes. it sets up everything else in that house and nothing much can be to that house until the framing is done.

BotBuilt Robotics

Robots are great with precision, when building cars, boats and things that require the use of light material like sheet metal, but when dealing with heavy materials such as Lumber, certain features have to be incorporated into the robotics system. BotBuilt Robots deals with Lumber, and they have been able to put the necessary features such as computer vision, motion path planning, tooling systems and collision detectors to enable their robotics system work efficiently.

BotBuilt has developed a software pack that uses two dimensional housing plan or three dimensional housing plan as a baseline. The computer processes the plan and builds up a panel book that shows the number of panel and dimensions of lumber needed to build the house. Once the robot plans its own motion path. They start building based on the housing plan.

The Future of Affordable Homes

While BotBuilt is focused on delivering revolutionary technologies to the robotics and construction industries, they are also motivated by the aim to make the construction process more inexpensive and sustainable.

The BotBuilt robotics systems help to make housing more affordable by reducing cost. When buildings are made using the traditional method, materials quantities are estimated and bought at high cost. BotBuilt systems eliminates wild guess but giving the exact materials need for the constructions, the system is also able to look at the market data, and shows were the material is cheapest at that point in time. Following the accurate assembly of construction frame components by BotBuilt’s robots, framing would be sent on-site to residences for assembly by workers. For builders, this reduces financial costs associated with purchasing wood in smaller (and therefore more expensive) quantities from lumberyards, as well as resources lost due to human mistake during framing. By leaving framing to dependable machinery, builders save time and money in the long run by smoothing the route to home inspections and making it easier for other tradesmen such as plumbers to conduct their work on the home.

The BotBuilt is currently doing wall panels with the sheathing and primary working with developers. They plan on extending their services to include and insulation package and a precut system, were the robots cut out the plumbing and wiring systems. This will involve pre-planning, but the company is keen on solving construction problems that consume time and lots of money.

With Brent Wadas as Chief executive officer, Barrett Ames as Chief technology officer and Devine as COO. They were determined to make housing affordable. Their technology and mission has already getting noticed across the globe, including being accepted into the prestigious YCombinator accelerator for the Winter21 cohort and a cofounder selected for inclusion on the prestigious Forbes 30 Under 30 list for 2023.

Mud Frontier

Earth:

Today, 1 in 3 humans live and work in buildings made from mud. The techniques to construct earthen buildings have been practiced across the planet for over 10,000 years.

SHIBHAM, YEMEN: “The Manhattan of the Desert”

The Mud skyscrapers within the walled city of Shibham were erected over 500 years ago. 

The mud city represents one of the earliest examples of urban planning for vertical construction.

COLORADO, USA:

Professor Ronal Rael is experimenting with a new combination of Mud and human ingenuity in San Luis Valley, Colorado. 

Rael 3D printed this Adobe vault without formwork or reinforcement. 

The angled slicing configuration enables the 6-axis robotic arm to build beyond the X-Y-Z axis of most gantry 3D printers.

The 3D printer by Twenty Additive Manufacturing starts at €345,000.

Rael recently printed in the heart of Denver, Colorado with the original model of his 3D printer. In the left silo of the photo above, you can see Rael’s original printer that starts at $29,500 from 3D potter.

Professor Rael, a Berkely student, and Rael’s son worked together to build the elegant towers seen above. Curious bystanders wandered up to watch with amazement as the machine deposited mud towers in front of the Denver History Museum.

A biker stopped to observe the alien machine in action. He asked Rael ‘isn’t there a guy that 3D prints mud buildings?’ Rael’s response was something along the lines of ‘yes, I am him’. Needless to say, the biker became very excited.

At some point in the 10,000 years of mud construction someone decided to add Earthen structures to the building code- just ask Rael, he lives in an inherited adobe home- and Rael’s former 3D printed Mud Silo project is permitted.

The design of the dome, or nubian vault, is in the shape of a catenary arch. 

Since a chain always hangs in complete tension, the catenary arch (the upside down chain) rests in complete compression; the arch allows materials with high compressive strength and low tensile strength, like concrete and mud, to form robust structures without reinforcement. 

The design freedom of 3D printing paired with the poor tensile strength of mud could increase the use of arches in the future of 3D printed design.

The 4th-century ruins of The Palace of Ctesiphon expresses the power of the catenary arch.

The last Persian capital in Iraq, the Palace of Ctesiphon, used mud brick to span over 25 meters (82ft.) without the use of formwork during its construction.

The Palace of Ctesiphon, aqueducts, and countless other ancient structures prove that ancient civilizations understood the omnipresent forces of compression and tension.

When these forces are understood we construct geometries that function in harmony with nature.

With that said- nature presents its challenges too.

MASSA LOMBARDA, ITALY:

In the photo above, the blue machine on the left is feeding dirt to the metallic 3D printer. The hole dug by the blue machine became a pond, and the dirt it moved became a 323-square-foot building; as seen completed in the photo below. 

0-kilometer supply chains are the vision of the Italian designers working at WASP; unload the printer on-site and erect your house using the dirt next to the machine. 

The rice husk, straw and mud mixture looks and feels like a coarse rope once it dries. 

The United Nations branch of Supply Chain Service recently visited the WASP headquarters to investigate this team’s disruptive potential.

From a material standpoint 3D printing mud has several challenges, but the potential upside is -to say the least- disruptive.

Typical 3D concrete printing mortar cost over $500 per ton and contain an assortment of sand, water, cement, additives, and fibers. The entire project can be ruined by an error in these sensitive mortar mixtures.

3D printable Geopolymers will cost you around $860- 2320 per ton.

According to WASP, the material cost of the building above is 900 Euro ($980)- dirt cheap. ***note from the editor, the mixing process still requires rotor stators during the print which are $1200 expendable parts good for 10-30 tons of material each***

However, to print with mud WASP had to conduct extensive material experiments on the contents of the soil on site. 

One of the hardest variables of 3D printing dirt is the components of the dirt: sand, clay, silt, etc, can drastically change from one meter to the next.

This change in components causes inconsistent material properties; and inconsistent material is the downfall of projects, literally.

Another challenge of printing with Adobe is erosion. 

To combat erosion WASP is once again looking to the past.

“Roman concrete,” CEO of WASP Massimo Moretti, explained in his deep Italian accent. 

Roman concrete is fundamentally different from the concrete that makes the bridges, buildings, and infrastructure that enables human life today. If we’re lucky, the concrete we use crumbles after 100 years; so what allows the aqueducts, the largest unreinforced concrete dome- the Pantheon- and other Roman architecture to survive 2,000 years of erosion?

First Vitruvius, and later Pliny the Elder (who died in the Pompeii volcano) recorded that the best concrete was made with ash from volcanic regions of the Gulf of Naples. 

For two millennia the recipe was lost. In 2023, the brightest and highest-funded institutions in the world teamed up to uncover the Roman secrets.

For two millennia the recipe was lost. In 2023, the brightest and highest-funded institutions in the world teamed up to uncover the Roman secrets.

The researchers discovered the Romans combined an overabundance of lime and volcanic ash to create a superheated reaction.

The ‘hot mix’ results in new reactions, faster curing rates, and self-healing concrete. 

When the concrete cures and eventually cracks, it exposes the lime to air and water; this mixture rekindles the initial reaction, bringing the lime back to life to expand and fill the crack.

In the past, the excessive amounts of lime were thought to be an accident by the Romans.

The abundance of lime in the mixture continuously causes the ancient concrete to heal itself just like a scab repairing a cut- and the volcanic ash and lime required to recreate this concrete is abundant. 

After getting into the intricacies of Roman concrete with Massimo he powerfully summed up our conversation in one word: “Alchemy!”

Massimo always speaks of his work in a philosophical light.

Just as a river melts away one layer of Earth’s sediment at a time, the building above was eroded until it had to be destroyed. There are no articles exposing the truth about this building’s unfortunate end, but I saw its gravesite first hand and according to the WASP team themselves, it lasted under a year.

The destruction of this unprecedented architectural marvel represents the bitter-sweet reality that WASP is potentially decades ahead of their time. 

“There’s a bunch of solutions for erosion, but nothing that’s natural and cheap in Africa and South America and Middle East and India or Asia areas. These are the areas to make a difference in… When I lived in Zimbabwe lots of the homes were built out of earth, structurally it can be done but erosion is still a problem.”, James Lymon, CEO of Mudbots, explained.

Shortly after James told me this I learned about the Asir Mountain Province of Saudi Arabia; a place with adobe buildings, but more importantly a natural and cheap solution to erosion. 

Slate rocks extrude from the walls and act as a watershed, preventing water from freely running down the surface and eroding it- giving the buildings an alluring facade, and expressing one of the most primitive and powerful forms of human ingenuity. 

The collaboration of ancient wisdom and sublime 21st-century technology leaves us standing at the precipice of a revolution – or as Rael calls it- The Mud Frontier.

*walk out music*

Fannie Mae Includes 3D Printed Homes in Latest Selling Guide

The biggest news is that they determined 3d printed homes fall in line with any other form of construction. Has 3D printed construction gone mainstream? Is this a responsible choice?

Check out the official Selling Guide Announcement https://singlefamily.fanniemae.com/media/36766/display

This will certainly enable many projects which were previously stuck on the back-burner but I am not convinced it is fair to blanket all 3D printed homes into the same category. There are so many different structural strategies and materials used to print houses. Some ‘printed homes’ use only spray foam like the old MIT projects. This article gives no guidance as to what materials are acceptable or what minimum parameters those materials should meet.

A huge hurdle has been lifted, now that Fannie Mae has opened the gates to 3D printed houses the next big step will be the home insurance companies. I can only imagine these things happen slowly at first then all at once, it’s surprising to see Fannie Mae mentioning 3D printed homes with less that 1000 of them built around the world but that number will certainly be surpassed in coming years as it becomes easier than ever to achieve these projects. We are entering a wild west era for construction automation and it is incredible to see! Just yesterday I was complaining about all the regulations in housing, how restrictive it seems and how the powers that be seem not to want solutions. Now they open it up and there is a whole new concern but progress feels great!

Now the responsibility lies on the innovative, forward thinking individuals we have followed along behind the camera for the past 4 years. 3D printed construction companies everywhere will be further enabled to build in regions previously on the fence and that adoption will increase the momentum even further. My hope is that through the integrity of engineers, the construction automation industry as a whole can demonstrate responsibility in the face of the newfound freedoms enabled by this Fannie Mae announcement.

Do you want to get a job in this burgeoning industry? Submit a pdf resume to recruiter@humanrobotarmy.com and tell us why you love construction automation. Need to hire the most passionate people in 3DCP? Let us know about that too!

Groundbreaking Innovations in 3D Printed Construction: Lessons from IAAC and the Future of Sustainable Architecture

The DFAB House: Digitizing Construction

Swiss Plateau region, Dübendorf, Switzerland

“researchers from eight ETH Zurich professorships have come together with industry experts and planning professionals in a unique way to explore and test how digital fabrication can change the way we design and build.” 

DFAB House

The construction industry ranks among the least digitized sectors globally. In the United States, construction is second to last on the MGI’s digitization index, while in Europe, construction holds the last position. 

The DFAB house pioneered the world’s first digitally planned and primarily robotically constructed residential building. Universities, researchers, and industry professionals spent four years developing the machinery and methods that crafted the DFAB house. This architectural laboratory displays the potential of Digital FABrication in the notoriously archaic construction sector.


“Consider that in the United States between 1947 and 2010, agriculture achieved cumulative real growth in its productivity of 1,510% and manufacturing 760%. Construction managed only 6%. U.S. construction-sector productivity is lower today than it was in 1968” -Marketwatch 2017

Globally, construction lacks 1.6 Trillion dollars of infrastructure investment every year, with 1/3 of this investment missing in North America. This number matters. Construction unites, shelters, and hydrates our people. It creates our workspaces, schools, energy, and production plants and has consequences far beyond itself. Project management and technological innovation are two crucial factors in fixing construction productivity.

5 novel construction methods used in DFAB house

McKinsey estimates that 5 – 10x productivity boosts are achievable for some parts of the industry by constructing buildings in a prefabricated manufacturing style. Researchers used automation in conjunction with prefabrication to build the top floors of the DFAB house – mirroring the offsite manufacturing process of cars. “Using the computational design model, the multi-robotic system fabricated and assembled the design. Each beam was gripped and positioned by the robot, then cut using a CNC-controlled saw. Following this, the robot then milled and pre-drilled all of the required holes for the connection detailing.” – DFAB

Spatial Timber Assemblies

 The structure was transported on a flatbed truck, craned into place, and wrapped in translucent spaceship insulation: aerogel. 

About 90% of firms using prefabrication report improved productivity, quality, and schedule certainty compared to traditional stick-built construction. The competitive advantage prefabrication has over traditional construction techniques is that laborious tasks such as installing electrical, insulation, and plumbing are completed in a centralized area. The factory system allows for increased automation, a more predictable, safe job site, and standardized techniques and equipment, potentially saving time and money. Imagine if you built your car on-site. Or your phone? What about your furniture? Damn it, Ikea. Jokes aside, prefab also has challenges, primarily involving transportation, assembly, and significant upfront investment. 
Digital planning involves transitioning from paper-based methods to online, real-time information sharing. The heavy reliance on paper for managing blueprints, design drawings, procurement, equipment logs, supply orders, progress reports, and punch lists worsens construction’s low productivity. Lack of digitization leads to delayed and fragmented information sharing, discrepancies between owners and contractors, and wasted data. Not to mention paper-based systems take more time.


Digitally managing and planning are potent strategies; equally as interesting is digitally constructing buildings. Computer aided design (CAD) allows architects and engineers to uncover the most efficient structure and rapidly iterate their designs. 

The 3D printed formwork of the DFAB ceiling is optimized using CAD models. The computer-generated a lightweight but structurally optimized structure. The ceiling displays the convergence of creativity and technology in this new building era. “The key benefit of 3D printing is that geometric complexity and customization do not increase production cost and time” – DFAB. 

However, this does not mean that production cost and time is low. This is a common misconception in the 3D concrete printing industry. If 3DCP companies are slicing costs in half, why don’t these firms share the receipts for their finished products? 

On-site In-Situ Fabricator

Since CAD modeling is already commonplace in construction, adopting robots like 3D printers and In-Situ Fabricators that operate from 3D models is a relatively small step away. The In-Situ Fabricator (IF) constructed the rebar reinforcement within the double curved wall in the DFAB house. The machine rolls like a tank and meticulously welds rebar on-site. IF interacts with its environment, responds to unforeseen changes, and optimizes the fabrication process without relying on human interaction. This machine possesses “cyber-physical” capabilities.

Entry into the Fourth Industrial Revolution

These Cyber-physical advancements are sprouting in the 3D concrete printing industry. Intelligent batch plants monitor their environments’ ever-changing conditions, humidity, and nozzle temperature and adjust the mix accordingly. Gantry systems are learning to detect wind shifts and correct the nozzle position while continuously printing. 
The explosive advancements of 3DCP have the same catalysts that enabled the creation of the DFAB house:

Display of industry progress by Vertico

University:

Institutions such as the Technical University of Texas, the Technical University of Denmark, RMIT, the Institute for Advanced Architecture of Catalonia (IAAC), and MIT are a few well-known investors. University of Arkansas was awarded a 3.5 million dollar grant to advance 3DCP.

 
Private competition:

Each of the 360+ 3DCP firms and 103+ printer manufacturers are ferociously innovating to assert themselves as the machine for the masses: big-name partnerships and government interest are speeding up progress. Get a full list of manufacturers as a member of the Automation Nation or in the course How to Print a House


40% of 3D-printed buildings worldwide were built in 2022— proving this field’s young and explosive growth.

100 home development in partnership with ICON and Lennar. 7 3DCP deployed, Georgetown TX
A critical enabler of 3DCP growth is reconfiguring regulations and building codes. Adopting a building code for 3D-printed structures is challenging because the thickness, height, speed, and material deposited can vary drastically. All 360 companies have unique methods and makeups. However, The International Code Council’s Evaluation Service (ICC- E.S.) approved Black Buffalo and ICON walls. Code compliance will save these companies the time and money of complying with unrelated but established codes. Furthermore, the International Organisation for Standardization (ISO) and the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) are developing industry standards emphasizing structural and infrastructure elements. Standards are the bridge between conventional and digital construction (pun intended). 

If governments are serious about helping the environment, investing in advancing building codes and this technology is a great start. Construction is responsible for an estimated ⅓ of the world’s waste and 40% of carbon emissions… 

“To accommodate the largest wave of building growth in human history, from 2020 to 2060, we expect to add about 2.6 trillion ft2 (240 billion m2) of new floor area to the global building stock, the equivalent of adding an entire New York City to the world, every month, for 40 years.”- Architecture2030.org

In other words, we are building ourselves into a “carbon lock,” as the inefficient buildings we construct today will spill carbon for decades. 20% of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. come from heating, cooling, and powering our homes. If American home emissions were considered a country, they would emit more carbon than Germany. Germany has the fourth largest GDP on Earth.

WASP designers in Italy are attacking this problem by optimizing buildings to ventilate and insulate naturally. Their 3D printer deposited the dirt on site, and due to the nature of 3DP, the optimized structure was a breeze to create.

WASP building utilizes traditional ventilation technique

Energy efficiency is essential, but the most carbon-intensive part of a home is the construction of the building. The average life expectancy of an American home is only 40 years. More sustainable practices and permanent structures can mitigate the consequences of the tear-down and rebuild culture of the US.

Our construction habits have ripples on our infrastructure, environment, and society which makes digitizing and automating construction historical. BIM networks, prefabrication, and robotic home builders are propelling us into a more developed world. Upon leaving the DFAB house, I felt grateful to be one of the few standing at the precipice of a revolution, watching it unfold, maneuver and grow into the world around us. 

Works Cited:

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1922205117#fig03https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/imagining-constructions-digital-futurehttps://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/digital-america-a-tale-of-the-haves-and-have-moreshttps://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/operations/our%20insights/reinventing%20construction%20through%20a%20productivity%20revolution/mgi-reinventing-construction-executive-summary.pdfhttps://www.facebook.com/simonemantovani.arquitetura.design/photos/a.891380407594027/2632117186853665/?type=3https://www.boxabl.com/https://techcrunch.com/2022/11/29/austin-based-icon-awarded-57-2-million-nasa-contract-for-lunar-construction-tech/https://www.empa.ch/web/nest/digital-fabricationhttps://architecture2030.org/why-the-building-sector/https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/the-construction-productivity-imperativehttps://unassumingeconomist.com/2017/06/construction-sector-the-worlds-next-productivity-story/https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-construction-industry-has-a-productivity-problem-and-heres-how-to-solve-it-2017-03-04https://dfabhouse.ch/smart-slab/https://constructionblog.autodesk.com/construction-industry-statistics/https://issuu.com/materialsaustralia/docs/ma_june_2023_final_web2/62https://www.empa.ch/web/nest/digital-fabricationhttps://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/bitstream/handle/20.500.11850/519223/DFABHOUSEimplicationsofabuildingscaledemonstratorforadoptionofdigitalfabricationinAEC.pdf?sequence=2https://architecture2030.org/why-the-building-sector/https://www.iconbuild.com/

Is our intelligence just as artificial as A.I.? A reflection on ConTech as we begin to look toward A.I.

Cruising without a care in the world knowing that this drive, like every drive, will be interruption-free, with no traffic lights to stop, no unexpected congestion, simply you getting into your connected vehicle. Your car is not autonomous yet and the US infrastructure is still subpar to that which allows das autobahn to lift its speed limits, yet this future is easy for me to imagine because the tools are already here for the most part, it’s a matter of data collection (GPS data + destination) and allocation (access to modify traffic lights). Seeing the future vision is the necessary requisite for any project, this initial over-optimism creates the project champion, that will then be able to carry the concept through to fruition. That said, having worked for short of a decade leading innovation projects, one thing I’ve learned is it is always exponentially easier to promote change on the periphery than to act as an ancillary change agent to the day-to-day. This article though is about a journey and critique of construction tech, so I’ll start with this idea above of the seamlessly connected roadway then explain how it’s relevant to construction tech, and like every thought-provoking article will close with some open questions to the industry.The seamlessly connected roadway concept is simple, first, make it mandatory to enter your destination into the authorized application and then create the push and pull. The pull is the predictability of an optimized drive every time while the push is reworking traffic penalties for deviating from the prescribed route at the prescribed speed in the prescribed lane, etc. As I mentioned above, most of the tools are here, for example, Google Maps and a culture of traffic laws, the missing component is the political push and a master algorithm that could regulate traffic lights, bridges, trains, etc. to optimize the route in real-time. Obviously, this is an understatement to the complexity of the challenge to make something like this a reality, the point I’d like to highlight here is the importance of operating on the periphery when it comes to innovation. New unicorns are being minted as we speak for autonomous vehicles and/or electric car companies and the narrative almost goes unquestioned. Personally, I only questioned this as I’m looking for a new car and was shocked at the lack of fuel efficacy improvements of my current 2010 Toyota Prius which gets virtually the same fuel economy as the 2023 model, and it made me wonder what would the impact be if instead of switching to autonomous electrics, we simply improved how we are currently using today’s vehicles. 


This future means that cars would be consuming far less gas, think UPS only making right turns or roundabouts that have already substantiated the savings, all without having to switch to electric vehicles. This concept also brings with it serious privacy debates and a political risk of being totalitarian, unless of course it’s a huge success and the system doesn’t penalize a person for spilling coffee and veering off course or said less politely if it could allow a socially acceptable level of failure to account for human stupidity and automatically adjust accordingly to balance human sentiment with performance. Yet, this failure risk, project duration, and a myriad of other factors are why it’s easier to stay in the periphery and the path of less resistance is to not question the narrative, progress must be good, and eclectic cars, unlike my 2010 Prius are cool! Disclaimer, I am not against electric cars, I have not found the study that shows what the carbon footprint reduction would be if all cars drove at optimal rates and I am not disagreeing that electric autonomous vehicles are relevant technology for the future, simply saying there may be parallel advancements that could also have a dramatic reduction to our carbon footprint while improving our quality of lives at a lower cost and quicker turnaround. Transitioning back to construction tech, the point that I want to highlight is the susceptibility of these shiny objects to becoming surrogates for the goals and that once a narrative is established it can be extremely difficult to switch directions.


Construction, like the automotive industry, is massive and accounts for ≈4% of the GDP in the US (Automotive is ≈3%) and creates our shelter, our work, and our entertainment. We’ve seen venture investments in ConTech growing from under $0.1B in 2011 to $5.4B in 2022, while still trailing the $10-13B invested in electric vehicles and components, it has become a formable industry, yet fragmented and lacking the generalizability to fully capture the excitement and investment like automotive. And while nothing exists in a vacuum and urban planning, construction, mobility, etc. are all interconnected, the ecological impact of construction and its product, buildings, is comparable with energy use in buildings accounting for 17% and transportation 16% of total CO2 emissions (noting these figures vary substantially to what’s included, how they are calculated, etc.) This oversimplification of the macro-picture is simply to illustrate that while these industries are comparable in size and impact, automotive receives a disproportionate amount of the global discussion from investment to regulations and that ConTech has potential for growth. A myriad of reasons can easily explain this from the fragmentation of the construction industry lacking lobbying groups to cars being a consumer product, or maybe it was just an evangelical entrepreneur who parlayed his success with Paypal to forge a new car company that capitalized on America’s love of cars with the perfect storyline. (Tesla does not define itself though as a car company) Whatever the reasons, the fact is that ConTech is here, it has its storyline(s), its rising unicorns, and my question of all is rambling takes me back to highlighted susceptibility above, which has modular; 3D printing; construction management software; BIM; Digital Twins (reality capture); and other technologies become the goal with the assumption that their growth will bring the promised productivity gains; automation / reduced labor demand; and provide a more sustainable construction? 


Up to now, I’ve loosely established that ConTech can be both economically and ecologically with near parity to automotive, yet the funding is not as universal as is within the automotive space. Continuing with the analogy of the switch towards EVs, there is the question of infrastructure, i.e. building out a charger network. Construction is sitting on the opportunity to standardize its operations and capitalize on the arbitrage of its lack of productivity increases (almost every pitch deck has some form of the Mckinsey productivity chart from 2015). As the nation starts to cut deals to open charging networks and set standards on universal charger designs, the myriad of ConTech advancements have done little to standardize permitting, building codes, take-offs, bidding, and project management despite the availability of tools like BIM, LEED, and a myriad of project management software for years. This lack of transparency and mention of the bureaucratic costs associated with construction makes it challenging for new technology to be adopted and scaled into the built world. The bespoke nature of buildings means per-project set-up costs easily negate the potential savings and even if savings can be achieved they are benchmarked to unrealistic expectations like not accounting for change orders or unexpected permitting challenges. This lack of tangible productivity gains is a narrative though that gets little voice as speaking out goes against too many vested interests, from VCs that hype up their investments (primarily in software), to corporates that want to highlight that they are progressive, to the self-fulfilling world of ConTech with its conferences, to the start-ups themselves that have to sell the dream. “In theory, theory and reality are the same. But in reality, they are different.” This quote which lacks attribution dates back at least to the late 1800s and speaks to me of the importance of predictability, knowing the real world infinitely better so that theory merges with reality, is in some ways paraphrasing the promise of the day with A.I. (Artificial Intelligence). Predictability is the slow and steady metric, that will win the race to increased productivity in construction, yet as mentioned, slow, steady, and interdependent makes for a lousy pitch deck, especially over the past several years of optimism. As every industry currently works to understand how AI will impact them, potentially now is the inflection point when ConTech needs to come to terms with the excitement of this recent boom as construction was the last frontier (maybe better the most recent frontier) where LPs, GPs, and others flush with cash where excited to repurpose their software to this industry in need of salvation. To be candid, I shared this optimism bias, it was exciting times to be in ConTech, yet looking backward, I caution that this is a delicate balance, and while I may have been misguided, I was not mistaken. Every project needs funding, they need favorable sentiment, they need innovative technological breakthroughs, etc., but this balance is a delicate one, as bubbles can over-allocate resources that contribute little to fundamental change and this lost momentum can cause a downward spiral in construction tech. So as the industry now adopts the latest trend (not to infer that this trend is good, bad, or forever, simply that this is the latest fad), I’d like to highlight my opinion that most often technology is most beneficial in an aggregated use case and this is an opportunity to reshape the narratives of recent.

3D Construction printing (3DCP), is one of these golden technologies, it embodies the propensities highlighted above where we speak more of something being 3D printed than its comparison to conventional. Justifiably, 3DCP offers the ability to be the pacemaker to a construction site, opening up the potential for the entire ecosystem to rely on its standard of truth to compress build times, as the as-built matches a digital file, which means prefab elements require no site rework and deliveries scheduled without hiccups or insurance companies now have a timestamped digital file to use in the actuary tables. The technology noted is still very much in its infancy and early scaling stage, so cost and state of the technology aside, the allure of printing has completely replaced its intended purpose of increased productivity, decreased labor, and overall cost reduction. All noted and easily excusable if the robotic precision was measured by some standard of predictability, like OEE. It’s completely normal for start-ups to have a delta as the prototype’s features and benefits are still in development, simply noting that this delta is extremely well hidden with 3DCP. Nonetheless, this golden standard of OEE does not solve everything, as autonomous vehicles for example that have been increasing reliability to detect dangers receive press coverage of every accident while nearly 100 people die daily in the US from car crashes, which highlights this journey of tech adoption is not without a barrier of human sentiment, fear, and acceptance. One example that speaks to the success of prioritizing predictability fits both the bespoke nature of construction and the power of user adoption. In a talk with founder Uri Levine, he revealed that the algorithm was programmed to highlight the route with the highest probability of arriving on time and that the maps were user generated. The user-generated component means that if the majority of cars turned in a circle that it would infer a roundabout and this is how they generated the maps, while I’m not an expert in project management tools, the ones I’ve used have all been top-down management, not ground up like this (no pun intended). The second component was prioritizing predictability, this may be counter to most people wanting the quickest route, just like construction we want to improve speed, but this “guarantee” of sorts led users to believe in the quality of the product, thus bringing up user adoption, and eventually having robust options to also provide the quickest routes. I have not seen true empirical data yet on user adoption and documented benefits of a lot of the ConTech software that has been rolled out in the past years, yet confident to speculate that few have this compounding rate of increasing predictability. As this theme of unicorn stories of singular mutually exclusive technologies like 3DCP continues to grow, we also run the risk of being blindsided by parallel advancements with incumbent technologies. There are a myriad of digital fabrication options from automated CMU placing robots to autonomous drywalling and more, and without a proper baseline to connect these, I fear the construction industry will struggle to meet its innovation targets. 


As the ConTech industry now begins to integrate and adopt A.I. as the solution, it’s important to remember that no industry exists in a vacuum and one paradigm-shifting innovation does not negate a myriad of others. Construction remains a diverse and complex equation to solve, as years of processes have trained contractors to pad their bids and keep their guard-ups. Litigation from project delays, and safety issues, to failing buildings, has led to an industry cautious to embrace change, and rightfully so. Yet, the industry has made progress in getting publicity for good and bad, it has brought in funding, investors, and technologies from silicon valley, academia, the military, and more, minting unicorns, creating new university departments and curriculums, and the large developers and builders have all created innovation teams. As the macro-economy remains elusive, this is a time of realignment and I ask the industry to be critical of the narrative that progress is inherently good, and that sometimes vested interest may not share the same time horizon to honestly create the infrastructure change that is needed and that the industry demands empirical measurements of efficacy. 


So while the ConTech community continues to capitalize on the arbitrage between current building techniques and Industry 4.0’s promise, I am also asking myself what the future of buildings looks like. Not to undermine the needed and already achieved strides in building technologies, but like Uber did not change the product (i.e. the taxi) it changed the service, the construction world also needs to start asking how it is changing the service? What will it mean when a building will have a complete BOM (bill of materials), its digital twin, where the building can be valued independently of the land (i.e. separate real estate into a building and land product). Will this create new markets for interchangeable building materials or components, as up until now the model was that the depreciation of the building was to be offset by the appreciation of the property. (Analogous to leased cars valued off depreciation or the used car market) Or will new use case models emerge, like with cars as autonomous vehicles become the norm, and parking garages will be repurposed as cars will be shared. The point I’d like to end with is simply that the construction industry is only at the very beginning of its transition and we really have little idea what the future of sharing economy, IoT, smart cities, decentralized production, and the rise of A.I. will impact how the world interacts with its product, buildings, but the one element that appears clear to me is a need for a better-packaged product. Buildings need to be standardized and digitized not just from the composition perspective but also from the modification and construction perspective so that these new technologies can speak to and reallocate resources, like building materials and building equipment so that like my vision of the interconnected roadways we can work towards a common goal. This goal is a journey and I hope that one day we’ll have both autonomous electric vehicles and the interconnected infrastructure, just like I hope that one-day construction will deliver a 100% predictable product that is ecologically sustainable and economically available to provide the needed shelter and productive spaces that we live in. 

Postscript on the title:

This article illustrates some of the narratives that we, the construction tech world, have created and how they themselves can become truths. So I ask myself, how different really is our intelligence that is judged by our ability to evaluate technology based on these creations, so different from that of A.I… one main one is that we screen for and are critical of the data sets used to train computer models while paying little attention to where our own biases may come from.

About the Author:


Matthew Carli is a global construction tech executive with an accomplished track record of founding and spearheading innovation efforts from starting an innovation team to developing holistic operational strategies. With experience in both the start-up and corporate world, working and living around the world, an MBA in international business, and a background in strategy and business development, Matthew brings a holistic human perspective toward shaping new ventures. Passionate about creating positive change he currently consults start-ups and investors. Based in Miami, FL, and open to new opportunities.
matthewdcarli@gmail.com | https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewcarli/

The Rise of Geopolymer Buildings | A World First

In the realm of 3D printed construction, geopolymer has long been hailed as an eco-friendly alternative to traditional concrete. However, until now, the world had yet to witness the creation of a 3D printed geopolymer building. In this exciting video, we delve into not only the groundbreaking 3D printed geopolymer building but also explore a precast geopolymer structure and innovative flat pack disaster housing. Join me, Jarett Gross, as I take you on this journey of automation and sustainability.

Firstly, I had the pleasure of meeting William Hoff from Geopolymer International, who has been tirelessly searching for a solution to low-cost housing for over 30 years. Inspired by the United Nations’ efforts to provide better shelter for refugee camps, William embarked on his mission to utilize geopolymer instead of steel or concrete. To achieve this, he cleverly repurposed a used shipping container into a portable, precast mold system. By casting geopolymer walls inside the container, he was able to create a cost-effective and sustainable construction solution.

Curious about the lifting process, I inquired about how the walls were maneuvered into place. William explained that a 10,000-pound forklift was used to carefully position the precast sections. With a glance inside, it became evident that the system employed angle iron and embedded fixtures to weld the panels together, creating a sturdy structure. This innovative approach, reminiscent of the tilt-up concrete technique, showcased the versatility of geopolymer as a building material.

As we delved deeper into the science behind geopolymer, William demonstrated the components used to create this remarkable material. Silicates were mixed with reactive minerals, along with sand, to form the geopolymer. William emphasized the importance of using dry sand to avoid moisture-related issues, as geopolymer’s strength lies in its crystalline structure. Resistant to extreme heat and highly durable, geopolymer boasts remarkable resilience, making it an excellent choice for construction.

William also clarified a common misconception about geopolymer, noting that it is not an alkaline-activated material as some might think. Instead, it undergoes a process of polymerization, growing a matrix of crystals that interlock and reinforce the structure. This distinction is crucial because alkaline-activated materials can be hazardous, while geopolymer is safe to handle and poses no harm to the skin.

Intriguingly, Geopolymer International expanded its horizons from precast construction to embrace 3D concrete printing. Collaborating with Strongprint 3D, they successfully printed the world’s first geopolymer 3D printed house. The process involved using Renca geopolymer material, which was shipped from afar but is soon to be produced locally in the United States. This development is a testament to the increasing accessibility and affordability of geopolymer construction.

William explained that geopolymer’s exceptional bonding properties minimize cracking, with expansion joints mainly used in areas with columns. The flexibility of geopolymer allowed them to print continuously, although they divided the printing into five phases to accommodate the nighttime working schedule and ensure the well-being of their team.

Inside the house, I discovered that rough-ins for plumbing and electrical systems were already in place. William had strategically integrated PEX tubing and electrical cutouts while printing the structure, making the installation process significantly easier. This approach saved both time and expenses, providing a glimpse into the efficiency and practicality of geopolymer construction.

Throughout the interview, William passionately discussed the advantages of geopolymer over traditional Portland cement. He highlighted sustainability, durability, recyclability, fireproofing, and waterproofing as key factors. With Portland cement responsible for a significant portion of CO2 emissions, geopolymer emerged as a more environmentally friendly and longer-lasting alternative. William emphasized the recyclability of geopolymer, highlighting its potential to be crushed and reused, further reducing waste and enhancing sustainability.

In conclusion, witnessing the birth of 3D printed geopolymer construction is an exciting development for the industry. William Hoff and Geopolymer International are demonstrating this sustainable material, showcasing its versatility, strength, and longevity. Geopolymer is throwing its hat in the bucket for housing, disaster relief, and environmentally conscious building practices. As we embrace this innovative technology, the future of construction looks brighter and more sustainable than ever.

Note: This article is sponsored by the course “How to 3D Print a House” offered by Jarett Gross. The course provides in-depth insights into the construction process of 3D printed homes, comparing them to traditional construction methods and offering guidance on software, hardware, materials, and more. For those interested in embarking on their own 3D printed construction journey, the course offers valuable knowledge and is currently available at beta pricing.

Automating Welding in Construction

WIELDING: THE NEED FOR AUTOMATION

Over 500,000 workers are exposed to health and safety risks due to the hazardous nature of welding each year in the United States of America alone, one can only imagine the numbers when looked at on a global scale. These risks include overexposure to welding fumes and gases, which can result in serious health issues like cancer, respiratory illnesses, and impairments in speech and movement. Welding also exposes workers to constant risks of burns, eye damage, cuts, crushed toes and fingers, and electrocution, which is the most serious and immediate risk. Skilled welders will become scarcer and it’s even more challenging to keep the welders you have. To bridge the gap across the world, manufacturers are looking to automation and robotics at exponential levels, with forecasted growth of $10 Billion in the next five years. Automating the wielding sector is a little bit more difficult because welding involves fire and heating materials, so the standards are a little bit greater. Nevertheless when there is a challenge, there is an opportunity. Some companies around the world have taken hold of this opportunity and have created relevant solutions that are already being applied.

PATH ROBOTICS

Path Robotics was founded by Andy and Alex Lonsberry while working on their PhDs at Case Western, after they discovered a massive opportunity to rethink welding in 2014. Path Robotics is an Artificial Intelligence company producing autonomous welding robots based on proprietary artificial intelligence and computer vision algorithms.

The Path system scans and creates a 3D model of each part to be welded, using sensors it detects highly reflective surfaces and survive harsh manufacturing environments. It analyzes the sensor data on the fly to understand each part individually using proprietary AI, and creates quality weld by creating optimal robotic paths and part positioning. With the path robotic system, rework, part placement, perfect parts and robot programming is settled.

Path robotics have ability to learn on the job. The Robotics cells identify the seam and can make adjustments based on the part that is in front of the robot. Real-time feedback and post-weld inspection feed the AI technology to provide consistently optimal weld quality. Path is a true “turn-key” solution to the labor challenges.

SQUAREDOG ROBOTICS

SquareDog Robotics is an award-winning Hong Kong-based technology company specializing in smart service robots, it was established in 2018.  SquareDog Robotics mission is to create smart robotic solutions to intuitively complement and enhance man-made work in a whole new way. The company was formerly Welbot Technology before adopting the name SquareDog Robotics. The name comprises of two elements, Square and Dog. Square meaning they are original, self-developed and they develop from the base. Dog meaning Just as a Dog is man’s best friend, their robots is here to assist humans, not replace them.

SquareDog welding robot called SDG ROBO WELDER, uses artificial intelligence to program the welding technique to be used, into the robot. After using a scanner to scan and calculate every weld, the robot emphasis stability and begins to weld. One of its key applications is to assist the worker to execute and perform high quality works to a high degree of precision, with greater safety and ease , therefore resulting in enhanced productivity.

SquareDog robots are light, flexible, cost effective and reasonably priced. No special technique is needed to operate the robots, as it can be operated by a novice worker.

SquareDog robotics has made a lot of impact, since inception. They are dedicated to their mission to enhance man-made works.

ORANGEWOOD

Orangewood Labs is a company that designs and manufactures collaborative robotic arms for industrial processes, it was established in 2018 by  Aditya Bhatia and Abhinav Das with the aim to democratize robots, strengthening each maker’s abilities and boosting output on factory floors around the world, they are building AI-powered robotic arms for small and mid-sized industries. Although the industry leader’s robotic arms are far more accurate than orangewood robotics. Not every endeavor calls for perfect accuracy. Currently, they are concentrating on industrial applications including pick-and-place, welding, and spray painting.

REFERENCE

https://www.path-robotics.com/ Accessed on 19th April 2023

https://www.squaredogrobotics.com/index.php/en/ , https://youtu.be/NM9EfLtdJk4 Accessed on 20th April 2023

https://orangewood.co/  Accessed on 20th April 2023

COBOD Recent Completed Projects

According to the World Economic Forum, the housing gap will be 1.6 billion by 2025, and our existing operating model does not provide a solution. The global building and construction industry is facing significant problems. We are unable to keep up with demand, which inhibits global economic growth. COBOD’s mission is to build a better future by disrupting the global construction industry through world-class 3D construction robots. COBOD is the biggest 3D construction printing solution Company in the US with the most projects and activities across all states, they carry on these projects using locally sourced materials to reduce transportation, minimizing waste on-site and making buildings that last. COBOD follows an open-source approach, collaborating with consumers, academic institutions, and suppliers worldwide. COBOD is privately held, with important owners including General Electric, CEMEX, and PERI, and its partners include Dar Al Arkan (Saudi Arabia), L&T Construction (India), and JGC (Japan).

History of COBOD.

COBOD began as another company called HOUSE OF 3D PRINTING. The company carried out 3 years of research into the art of 3D printing in Denmark, after which they got a grant from the Danish Government. The Danish Government had concerns about 3D printing researches and knowledge the House of 3D printing was getting, as it was limited to only Denmark. The Grant given by the government was to travel around the world, carry out new researches, finding out new developments and bring the best Technology back into the Danish construction sector. Using this grant, The House of 3d Printing visited 38 different construction companies, projects and universities, at the end of this research they realized that the press has overstated the advantages of this technology and they were not so impressed. As 3D printing experts they knew they could do better and built their first 3D printer in just 6months, which is the first generation 3D construction printer. The house of 3d Printing demonstrated the potential of this technology by creating the first 3D printed building in Europe under 2 months, this was done with process transparency and total honesty, this single act created a global interest in the technology. The first printed house which was printed in 2017 is called BOD meaning Building on Demand, despite being smaller than 50 square meters (538 square feet), BOD is sufficiently big to show some of the architectural and financial advantages of using 3D printing technology in construction. The company at this point knew the company for this new innovation had to be separated, and COBOD was born, COBOD means Construction of Buildings on Demand. In 2019, COBOD 3D printed the building a second time in just 28 hours over 3 days. This was a productivity gain of 20x, which signifies the incredibly steep learning curve of the company and also the potential the technology has that is yet to be discovered. COBOD is headquartered in Denmark with regional offices and competence centers in Florida and Malaysia.

COBOD is currently leading in the construction of 3D printing as shown by global inventory. Research shows that by end of 2022, there were 129 3D printed buildings globally found on 105 building sites, Over 40 percent of projects, or 51 buildings, have been created using COBOD’s 3D construction printers worldwide and 40% of the construction sites where 3D-printed buildings have been constructed have also included these printers. In 2022 COBOD’s printers did almost 60% of all new 3D printed buildings. With more than 65 printers sold globally and major industrial players like GE Renewable Energy, Holcim, CEMEX, and PERI joining as strategic owners, COBOD has experienced fast growth in recent years. Further regional competence centers have been built in Miami and Kuala Lumpur to support this growth, and COBOD has even released an annual report.

Projects

Recently the COBOD printers have been taking over the industry and giving this 3D technology the attention it well deserves some of the projects are state of the art three floors smart home villa in Saudi, 10 houses 3d printed in 10 weeks using a COBOD printer.

State Of The Art Three Floors Smart Home Villa In Saudi 

The state of art smart home is currently the world’s tallest 3D printed building, it is a 3-story, 9.9 m tall building compromises 345 m2 and was made by the leading Saudi Arabian real estate developer, Dar Al Arkan, using a COBOD 3D construction printer. The first floor has an area of 130 m2 which includes a spacious hall which has several living areas, a kitchen, and 2 toilets. The second floor is 140 m2 and has 3 bedrooms (one of which is a master bedroom) 2 bathrooms, a living room, and a balcony. The third floor is a roof annex which holds a maid’s room with a bathroom, a multipurpose hall and a laundry room. In Saudi Arabi such a building, although it consists of 3 floors is referred to as a two story + annex, due to the third floor being somewhat smaller than the two first floors. The project was executed using local materials and the D.fab solution developed by Cemex and COBOD. This solution allows COBOD customers to use 99% local and inexpensive materials, which all of the walls of the 345 m2 building was printed with, while only relying on 1% sourced from a central location, It is an excellent illustration of how innovation and technology can coexist with safety and regulation because it was 3D printed in just 26 days and complies with all construction codes. Regarding the completed villa that was 3D printed The 3-story villa from Dar Al Arakan, the founder and general manager of COBOD  Henrik Lund-Nielsen said it, “truly represents state of the art of the 3D construction printing sector both in terms of scale and quality as well as in many other areas. The villa serves as an example of the technology’s capabilities in terms of scale, rapidity, the use of inexpensive local materials, and creative solutions. Our technique provides the world’s fastest construction process, and when this is combined with inexpensive locally produced concrete, a successful combination has been formed.”

HOUSES IN KENYA

The COBOD printer has been continually used to cover milestones in the 3D printing industry. 14Trees is a joint venture company formed by Holcim, the cement and concrete giant, and British International Investment to accelerate the provision of affordable housing in Africa. The joint venture built the first 3D printed homes in Africa as well as the world’s first 3D printed schools.  14Trees plans to 3D print up to 52 dwellings in Kilifi, Kenya, utilizing a single COBOD BOD2 printer which is made of high-quality materials and is carefully engineered to meet the high requirements of the construction industry both in terms of speed, stability, and durability. The joint venture finished the 3D printing of the walls of ten residences in January 2023 in just ten weeks from October 2022 to January 2023, using only one BOD2 printer.         “With 3D printing, you can solve two problems at once,” said 14Trees managing director Francois Perrot. “You can build faster like we have shown here with our 10 houses in 10 weeks. At the same time, we can achieve better cost efficiency, which will help make affordable housing a reality for the majority. In addition, you can build with less materials, which preserves the resources of the planet for future generations.” The 10 houses printed comprises of  6 three-bedrooms (76 m2 / 836 SF) and 4 two-bedrooms (56 m2 / 616 SF) houses have been 3D, making Mvule Gardens in Kilifi the largest 3D printed project to date . The productivity level of 14Trees is also unmatched as no other construction company in the US has matched this level. The Head of COBOD America, Philip Lund-Nielsen, made a remark of the impressive work the 14Trees used COBOD printer to achieve, He stated, “Considering how difficult the conditions are in Africa, it is impressive, that 14Trees has printed more houses on a single site, than any other construction 3D printing company in the US or elsewhere. In addition, they have done it faster, using just a single COBOD 3D printer not by using 5 printers or more”.

REFERENCE

GLOBAL INVENTORY OVER 3D PRINTED BUILDINGS SHOWS COBOD’S LEADING POSITION | COBOD International A/S (mynewsdesk.com) Accessed on the 5th April 2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07CfMdErO-8&t=782s Accessed on the 5th April 2023.

CyBe First Printed Home Stateside

CyBe Construction was established in 2012 by the founder and CEO Berry Hendriks. CyBe has developed hardware, software, building materials, and learning platforms, it is one of the leaders in this construction industry and has a motto to “learn by doing”. Unlike most 3D printing companies, one can say that the CEO and founder of CyBe Berry Hendriks has the blood of construction flowing throw his veins. Berry Hendriks’ family runs a construction company that dates back to 1922, where he’s brother is the current owner of the company, after his a father. He was a project manager in the company and produced a Bim project which meant he designed housing in 3d and at some point he has to manage almost 100 construction workers making sure that they would work starting at seven o’clock in the morning. After realizing the potential of the 3d printing industry he quit his job and started CyBe in 2012. The experiences gained helps CyBe to be more construction oriented than technology oriented, like Mr. Berry mentioned on the Automate Construction Podcast , “instead of focusing on the technology itself, we want to build faster and cheaper, the 3D printing and parametric designs technology is just a means to an end”.

(Article continues below)

CyBe has been able to develop a unique printing material called “CyBe MORTAR’, it contains very low chloride and sulphate content, allowing it to set in just one hour, and it has around 32% less integrated CO2 than Portland cement.

NEW TECHOLOGY (Robotic arm versus Gantry system)

One cannot really rigidly rank the printing systems been used, as they are determined by factors of what kind of project is been done, where is the project been done and the regulations governing the environment of where the project is being done.

When using a gantry system, it needs to be shipped in modular units and a crane or a forklift is needed on site to put all the piece in place. The setup and take down cost is somewhat expensive especially when used on jobsites. On the other hand the robotic arm is can be easy to convey, but has limited height range when printing. The focus for robotic arm is on printing and pre-casting elements, whether on site or offsite, which can be later assembled.

In 2019 CyBe had a collaboration with an Indian company, they were to build a G + 3 apartment and using the robotic arm CyBe was able to print elements of the building and assemble. Their next project to print a G plus 7 building led to the development of their new model gantry system. The gantry system is 7 m x 10 m x 4 m, which enables the company to build two in a day. This model prints the floor and the walls of the building simultaneously.

PROJECTS 

CyBe has had the opportunity to be involved with many projects, as well as head many others. Currently CyBe is working on the first permitted C Bay house in Florida. They are also looking to expand in the American market as 3DPC continues to grow.

CyBe currently has land in Netherland, where they plan on building an apartment complex for 12 people, who can rent it. This project is going to be the first permanent building their latest gantry technology would be used to print, it has a quotation that estimates to reduce construction cost by 30 % when compared to the convention construction. All things being equal they plan to begin printing in their factory by August or September 2023 and are currently selecting the 12 occupant of the homes.

Even though there is still a small market for 3D printing in the construction industry and it isn’t frequently utilized to build homes, the adoption of this technology as a more cost-effective construction method is growing.

FOR MORE DETAILED AND EDUCATIVE INFORMATION ON 3D PRINTING. CLICK THE LINK BELOW AND SUBSCRIBE

https://youtube.com/@automateconstructionpodcast

ETH Zurich & Research in Construction Automation

3D printing is a rapidly growing technology that often captures significant hype and attention. Researchers study this technology to determine its sustainability and potential applications. By educating the public with facts and real-life examples, they make it easier to understand the positive and negative effects of this emerging field. In the construction industry, 3D printing has proven to be a sustainable technology, with high productivity rates driving its advancement.

Economic incentives for 3D printing in construction primarily stem from labor replacement. As labor shifts towards high-end construction projects, such as skyscrapers, developed countries like the US and Canada face labor shortages. This creates a target market for 3D printing in the construction of single-family homes, where cost benefits come from replacing labor and traditional masonry. A US Army Corps of Engineers analysis, based on their BEE HUT project, supports these findings.

3D printing also introduces digitalization to the construction industry, with researchers working to bridge the gap between their studies and practical applications. However, there are challenges related to sustainability when using printed concrete:

  • High cement concentration in mix designs: Ongoing research aims to reduce cement content in 3D printed concrete, but changes at the material level are applicable to standard concrete as well, making shape efficiency the primary benefit of 3D printing.
  • Sand: As a limited resource and key material for 3D printing, ideal sand types (river or beach sand) are not always readily available, and countries with only desert sand must import large quantities. This results in high consumption of sand and cement in 3D printing.
  • Failure: Two major types of failures are strength-based failure and elastic bulking. Strength-based failure occurs when the material isn’t strong enough to support the weight of upper layers, while elastic bulking involves multiple factors such as geometry, elastic modulus, stiffness, and external forces like wind.

To improve sustainability, researchers are exploring CO2 reduction in cement production by substituting Portland cement with alternatives like fly ash, a residue from coal combustion that can enhance concrete durability and workability. However, fly ash is not sufficient on a global scale. Another potential material, called LC3 (Limestone, calcium, clay, cement), is currently under investigation for 3D printing use. LC3, created by combining clay burned at lower temperatures with limestone, functions like standard cement but produces 50% less CO2.

Research plays a crucial role in technology development, often leading to the creation of new programs and applications. Although it is difficult to predict the future of 3D printing, it is clear that there is still much untapped potential. As researchers continue to explore this technology, new opportunities and breakthroughs will likely be uncovered.


 https://ethz.ch/en.html
 
 

A Leader in On Site Automation Has Emerged

Diamond Age: MAKING IMPACT

The process of building houses hasn’t changed much in the last 100 years. Like many other 3D startups, Diamond Age set out to solve the problem of housing, but with a fresh spin on 3D printing technology. Co-founders Jack Oslan and Russell Varone identified the housing problem and came up with 3D printing as a solution. They spoke with land developers, structural engineers, architects, and representatives of building materials. All their conversations received mixed reactions, but they continued their search, knowing the potential of the 3D printing industry. After gaining momentum, Jack created a business thesis while Russell created a technology thesis. Established in 2018 and situated in Phoenix, Arizona, the company has created a Robotics-as-a-Service system that automates new home construction for the production housing market, utilizing 3D printing, mechatronics, and robotics. The company aims to address the difficulties faced by the construction industry, such as labor scarcity, high costs, and lengthy construction schedules.

Diamond Age has always been a company dedicated to its cause. Everyone who worked in the early days of Diamond Age knew each other, familiar with each other’s quirks and strengths. They could all weld, machine, and CAD. They were all hands-on builders who did everything themselves, which was crucial. An early team established the culture of always being hands-on with the machines. There were no department managers or directors, and even though the company is still growing, they are all intimately connected to the work, which is how they pushed a startup that can move the 3D printing industry.

Diamond Age’s 3D printing-based response to housing challenges is more environmentally friendly than traditional construction methods. The company uses sustainable materials, reducing waste and the environmental impact of building. The system also produces less noise and pollution, making it a more environmentally friendly option. Diamond Age can produce residences of all sizes and shapes thanks to the system’s scalability. The company’s emphasis on sustainability is not only great for the environment, but it also helps consumers save money on building costs. Furthermore, the approach has the potential to manufacture homes in as little as 30 days, significantly reducing construction cycle times and allowing for quick occupancy. This can help to address the issue of affordable housing, which is a big concern in many areas. The success of Diamond Age has not gone unnoticed, and the company has already made tremendous gains in its aim to change the building sector. The business just raised $50 million in a series A fundraising round, which it will use to expand its robots platform and complete its first commercial contract to build homes. The company has also grown in size and intends to expand further. Diamond Age’s technology has evolved significantly since its previous funding round, allowing it to print and construct a 2,000-square-foot single-story home. The business delivered its first scaled version of its system, as well as a full-scale 3-bed, 2-bath house in 11 months – 4 months ahead of plan. This led to the company’s first deal with a national homebuilder, the details of which the founders are keeping under wraps for the time being, but they anticipate that announcement will come shortly.

One of the major challenges the 3D industry is facing is the lack of exposure to the public. Diamond Age needs to educate the public about the benefits of automated construction. Many people are not familiar with the technology and may not understand how it works or why it is beneficial. However, companies like Automated Construction, whose sole purpose is to bring 3D printing of houses into the limelight, are certain that the public is not far from noticing this brilliant technology. As more people become aware of the labor shortages and challenges facing the construction industry

REFERENCES

https://youtu.be/To7QZpdFEeU Accessed on 30th March 2023

https://techcrunch.com/ Accessed on 30th March 2023

https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/diamond-age Accessed on 30th March 2023

MICOB Printing Indian Military Structures

MiCob private limited is a 3D printing company in India whose primary clients are the India defense military. They provide customized 3D Concrete Printing solution for various sectors like Infrastructure, Housing, Architecture, Outdoor furniture, etc. which is backed by years of research. Just like most 3D printing companies, the founders of MICOB- Ankita Sinha, Rishabh Mathur and Shashank Shekhar, had foreseen the impact 3D printing would have on the construction industry and joined it. 

One of the founders of MiCob Shashank Shekhar, a graduate in Civil engineering and a PHD graduate in 3D concrete printing, mentioned the intent of MiCob private limited in a podcast with automate construction. The intent of the company is not only to develop the 3D printing technology, but to solve problems using the technology. The company works closely with its clients and also educates them on- the scope of work to be carried out, the material to be used, the possible options on building with 3D technology, the type of finishes, the multiple modes of construction and the advantages as well as the disadvantages of every action carried out. They optimize time, cost and ensure things are delivered as discussed with the client. MiCob offers transparency in products, services and after-sales services for a lasting relationship with our clients.

MiCob deals on prefabrication construction i.e. they do most printing offsite. The company provides smaller versions of structures with the same quality that is to be constructed, in other to create a visual picture and increase the level of comfort for their clients in entrusting them with the project.

How It Began.

MiCob started the company selling only furniture. They started their journey with creating custom furniture, which was sold in different regions if India. After the company got in contact with the problems facing the military defense, they decided to focus on the military defense to ensure that they were solving a problem that otherwise won’t be solved.

MiCob developed their first gantry system in 2017, using grants from various government agencies in India. The second system was built in 2020. Both gantry systems where primarily used for research of software and material. In order to print long lasting structures that lasts about 5 to 10 decades, the company continually learnt from mistakes made in the research and built upon it. The company used a simple extruder in their research phase which they developed themselves. Materials were mixed in a separate pan mixer and poured into a hopper. Later on, they switched to using a combination of a continuous mixer which was coupled with a progressive screw cavity pump, and now, the company uses a combined mixer provided by Mtech. The gradual growth process of the company led to the brilliant and recognized MiCob known today.

MiCob currently supplies products to the military defense in India. They recently concluded various projects such as; a G plus one building which serves  as a watchtower, a G plus one building- housing about 64 soldiers, one G three building which is a conventional RCC structure having 3D printed wall panels. MiCob’s business plan is to deliver products that are 3D printed. Products such as bunker RI which is movable and can be deployed on site in 2 to 3 days when printed (which would take about 30 to 35 days using the traditional construction method), and large shelters that are printed in about 10 to 15 days. The company is keen on creating value added products. Selling printers is not a plan in the agenda of the company, however, MiCob is structuring a franchise model that would be made across nations at specific location in order to educate people on how to use the printers. Through this franchise, they would be able to create landscaping and furniture using 3D printing. This model will be available in about one to two months. MiCob is introducing a hybrid model into the construction industry where standard components like slabs, beams, and columns are made by conventional means while all non-load bearing components like walls are 3D printed; this also improves stability of the structure. The company is also expanding its factories by opening three (3) more units at strategic locations, and this will further help reduce the cost of production. MiCob is a team with a strong background in Construction, Automation, and Project management, supported by experienced mentors from a diverse background. Our high-performance solutions are backed by years of research at IIT Gandhinagar. 

WOHN Homes 3D Printing Wooden Living Spaces

Many companies in the construction industry set to make great impact using this new technology- 3D printers for building homes. WOHN homes has a different dimension to this technology. Could we say this dimension is a new breakthrough for the 3D printing industry? The CEO of WOHN homes, Morten Bove fell in love with the technology behind 3D printed houses but not the concrete materials used. He mentioned in a recent episode of The Automate Construction Podcast (linked at the bottom) that the real motive of joining the construction industry was to solve the problem of social inequalities by building affordable homes; he also did not fail to mention that he had come a long way in other industries before coming into the construction industry.

WOHN Home deals with an alternative material, which is a special formula between waste plastics and wood fiber. A lot of testing was done before this formula was birthed. During the testing process, many waste plastics were used as a replacement for concrete but the structures always collapsed. The company’s ultimate motivation gave them the zeal to pursue the quest of finding an alternative material for 3D printing of affordable homes and, because of the large amount of waste plastics generated a year, they were certain that something had to come out of it.  They thought of how these waste plastics could be reinforced without the use of concrete; as they needed a material that would leave little or no carbon footprints since they saw the huge carbon footprints left when producing cement. This is one of the main issues with every traditional construction process, and the use of concrete during 3D printing does not solve this problem. That’s when the company had an idea to add wood fiber- sawdust as reinforcement, which made the material a whole lot stronger and better, and a lot of successful testing have been done using this new special formula. This innovation can cause a paradigm shift in the way homes are built and constructed.

3D Printers and the Special Formula.

WOHN homes is to be sold anywhere in the world; the company prints everything in the factory and doesn’t need to print on site. After many tests and operations carried out, the company redesigned the extruder they work with, and now use a robotic arm due to the thickness of the material been used. The robotic arms increases the stability of the rig and reduces vibration when compared to the gantry. WOHN Homes revealed that they will officially start commercialization by the end of summer 2023. One of the main dealers will be developers, who build homes in volumes in order for the company to make larger impact to the society. The company is certain that their decision to sell mostly to developers wouldn’t delay sales because they check off the boxes of sustainability, affordability and waste.

WOHN Homes The Future.

A WOHN home has a lifecycle of 50 to 60 years, after which the house can be recycled by adding fresher waste; depending on the number of recycling the plastics used for the buildings have undergone. The company has a method put in place for evaluating and testing the homes eligible for recycling using this criterion. The element of recycling a home gradually kicks out the culture in the society of ‘use it once and throw it away’. In using polymers and wood fiber as an alternate material for 3D printing constructions, nothing really goes to waste- the plastics that cannot be used due to number of times it has been recycled (which ideally is 7 times) can be used for landfill and burnt for fuel by other companies. A waste product of wood called wood wool is turned into pulp, fluffed up and blown into channels known as cores, is used as insulation; which also reduces the use of fossil fuel to make rock wall types of products that are considered as heavy carbon contributors in the world. WOHN digs into the escalating urbanization with 200,000 people moving to cities and urban surroundings every day. A trend so transformative to our present way of living, that it requires equally transformative concepts and thinking to handle it.

Icon 3D Printing 100 Homes with Lennar near Austin, Tx

Discovering how economies of scale impact 3D printed houses has been one of the most highly anticipated aspects of the tech. I got the unique opportunity to visit the active construction site where Icon currently has 7 of their Vulcan concrete printers extruding their proprietary Lavacrete mix.

CEO Jason Ballard and I walked around brand new homes just starting their first layer all the way to the first home they printed which has already been turned over to Lennar for completion after printing. You can follow along our tour or listen to the podcast we did at the bottom of this article.

Icon is serving as the subcontractor for this Georgetown project at Wolf Ranch. They agreed to a fixed price $.01 below what the Lennar wall contractors would typically charge. This means the onus is on Icon to deliver the homes and even if the cost to them comes out higher in the end, Lennar will not be on the hook. Fixed construction contracts are rare these days and it is a testament to the confidence Icon has in their technology and team.

After printing, Icon has one responsibility left before the handover to Lennar for completion and thats attaching custom CNC routed wood to the top of the printed walls to which the roof trusses can be secured. This makes installing the roof a very typical process for Lennar and Icon is handling the challenge of joining the roof to the curvy shapes of the wall.

Most importantly we got an answer to the economies of scale question. Having a big project, big team and big partner helped drive down costs compared to one off printed homes or smaller developments. This is because the teams can be more specialized instead of having a 3-4 man crew for the whole process. Icon also gets more negotiating leverage with suppliers now that they have a big partner and bigger order quantities.

This 100 home project is huge, by far the biggest construction project in the 3DCP world at the moment but it’s still only the beginning. There are millions of homes to be built and Icon is working hard to build the machines that can scale to that many homes. This project is offering tremendous learning opportunities for Icon and Lennar, traditional construction intelligence still plays a big role in 3D printed construction projects and fine tuning the details will unlock further efficiencies making construction automation more competitive with time.

One more thing I have to mention is the data collection happening. I got a glimpse at Icons HUD of their project showing comprehensive data on all the active prints going on and the projects progression over the many days. Some of these infographics were developed in house others utilize Palantir tech and both were incredibly impressive, it really felt like the future of construction.

Want to help me put out more information on 3D printed construction and construction automation? Join the Automation Nation!

Live Prints & Top 10 Automation Firms from World of Concrete 2023

This year World of Concrete hosted many familiar 3DCP faces and some new teams too! I got interviews with RIC, Sika, Spacecrete, Geopolymer International, Cobod, Arc3D, Renca, Quickcrete, Ventures Equipment, and Mapei! I’ll try to give a little overview of what each had to share from the event. You can watch the interviews at the bottom of the article.

RIC was the highlight of the show with 2 printers on display and one in action. The robotic arm is on a mobile lift which gives it a tremendous Z-axis (height)  reach capability. They demonstrated printing quickcrete material at the event live. This is always a challenging feat, the law of engineering says that once you have an audience things will inevitably fail, despite this RIC managed to succeed both printing attempts on day 2 and 3 of the show.

Sika was also printing on a 3D Potter machine, you may recall when I visited their HQ/ Manufacturing facility last month. They were primarily demonstrating their unique material which can be deposited back in the hopper after being printed within a 15ish minute time frame. 

Spacecrete had a unique material solution, an admixture that when combined with concrete drastically increases it’s buildability. The CEO gave a demonstration mixing it live at his booth. They also had multiple iterations of concrete printing extruders. 

Geopolymer International brought their mixer pump to the show along with a huge variety of objects which are made with materials including the silica based geopolymer they love to use. This includes ceramics, hemp, asphalt, foam-crete, and rubbery materials. 

Cobod did not bring their printer this year but they did have an educational seminar which they allowed me to sit through. I missed the first half but the parts I saw were quite a good overview of the technology including some common pitfalls typical in any construction site like covering materials with a tarp if they are stored in a pile under a tree. Some of these things seem obvious to experts but many people in the 3DCP industry come from fields other than construction so educating these clients becomes a partial responsibility of the printer manufacturer.

ARC 3D is a new company on the scene of 3DCP, they brought a small scale model of what their truck mounted printer would look like on a job site. They also had some footage from the testing of their own extruder head. I am eager to see what their product looks like when it comes to fruition as they are taking a unique approach. They mentioned that their clients will not be restricted to a particular material and they are working on being able to work with local materials. 

Renca works closely with Geopolymer International and is a supplier of the geopolymer material for them. Geopolymer International will be starting a house project soon using a red version of the Renca material.

Quickcrete was in attendance and I got a quick interview with them, you may recall their material was used at the Houston 3D printed house project. Their material was also used at the RIC exhibit this year. They are very excited about the 3D printed construction industry. 

Ventures Equipment had a couple new systems for 3DCP a batch mixer with a scale for measuring your concrete ingredients. This will be a critical step for ultimately automating the mixing system. In the past Ventures Equipment did a sponsorship deal with my channel but that has since ended many months ago. I agreed to the sponsorship deal in the first place because they showed dedication to developing 3DCP mixing tech and that is still the case. This year their 3DCP offering is better than last year and I expect next years will improve too.

Maipei is the company Black Buffalo works with for their 3D printed mortar that was used on the recent Alquist project for Habitat in Virginia. This year they successfully achieved AC509 certification which was a very lengthy and expensive process. Now they are ready to hit the market with their certified material. They claim it is the first AC 509 certified material on the market and I believe that to be the case, other companies which have achieved this certification have yet to sell their material on the open market. 

There were a few more groups we’ve seen on my youtube channel that I met at the event and didn’t get the chance to film including R-Squared, Black Buffalo, Citizen Robotics & Matthew Carli. I also saw Homes Now & Heidelberg who I hope to feature on the channel in the near future. WOC 2023 was a great event and hopefully there will be even more automation there next year! 

Shoutout to the Automation Nation member I met at the event! As the community supporting my independent journalism with $10/month grows, I will be able to provide even better coverage of this ever rapidly developing industry of construction automation. Consider signing up at https://automateconstruction.com/nation and get access to my private list of 101 construction 3D printer manufacturers along with a map of which country they are from and virtual 360 tours of 3D printed houses around the world.

Rebuild 3DCP in Poland

Poland has been in the spotlight recently due to its proximity to conflict areas. By total coincidence, in close time proximity to when stray missiles hit Polish land I was scheduled to speak with the CEO of Rebuild 3DCP, Witold on the Automate Construction podcast. Rebuild is the company responsible for printing the first house in Poland on site.

You can listen to the podcast in its entirety for yourself at the link below. I’ll try to summarize what we discussed in this article. Currently Rebuild as a company is focused on the testing and measuring of its material parameters/ structural integrity. In order to implement this technology and construction at a large scale you have to possess a very clear understanding of the numbers that engineers can use to sign off on a building, ensuring that according to their calculations, it will stand. Having these calculations can be critical to permitting.

The first step for them was just getting the printer working and demonstrating the technology. There’s a huge difference between start ups before and after that point, before you actually get to the printing part, people have a gilded view, lacking full understanding of what’s required for the process, and the current state of the technology, which is not yet quite fully automated. In fact, there’s a long way to go towards full automation.

Rebuild has reached the point where the machine runs but the material needs to be dialed in. To my knowledge they are the only group implementing this technology in Poland, so they are now the leading experts of 3-D printed concrete in Poland. This means all of the trailblazing is up to them. It’s a big responsibility that will be the first step towards increased construction automation in their country, something I believe will be appreciated by many for years to come.

Witold came across this technology at his university where he was reviewing some research on 3d printed concrete technology. By my measure, there are 101 different concrete printer manufactures (the full list is available for automation nation members) obviously, they didn’t all come up with the idea originally. Many of them claim to and I believe it’s possible multiple could be telling the truth 3d printing has been around for a long time so it’s feasible that multiple people, even many people might independently come up with the idea to 3d print houses on their own. I would even venture to argue that it’s a natural consideration which comes to mind when you see a printer in action.

Witold specifically mentions it wasn’t his idea, but when they saw the research paper him and his team immediately saw that there were improvements they could implement for this technology. Knowing they could iterate beyond the current state of the market, they jumped in and have been contributing to improving this technology ever since spearheading the efforts in their country.

Concrete isn’t the only thing Rebuild seeks to automate, they also want to automate the reinforcement methods of the concrete. Taking another step towards the ultimate goal of automation. Most 3d printed construction jobs require a minimum of two people, often three or four people.

In Poland start ups like rebuild have access to grant funding to get started. They got their first round of grant funding at $200,000 then an additional round of $1 million converted to US according to Witold. 

We talked quite a bit about materials. The rebuild team is specialized in mechanical engineering so that’s one of the reasons materials is tricky, also there is such a limited demand for 3d Print Concrete in Poland. The material is not readily available and quite expensive as well. The material they’re currently using  has a three month warranty from the manufacture, and should last around six months, after about a year, it may not be good for use anymore.

It was great learning more about Witlolds experience founding his startup Rebuild in Poland. I can’t wait to see what they will bring to the table in coming years in the industry of construction automation.